From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Cc: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>,
mchehab@kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uvc: fix missing check to determine if element is found in list
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 15:10:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjnKvQZot2wnljmW@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiDSCugwwNc8HjqNX2Mp8GdFN0s=jgPkT_2d4kiVygp=XZa4w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 01:40:07PM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> Hi Xiaomeng
>
> Thanks for the patch. Maybe it would be better to just make a function
> to find the ITERM entity with a given id?
We already have a uvc_entity_by_id() which could be used for that, but
only for the second loop iteration. The first one finds any input
terminal. Also, the second loop restricts the search to a chain, while
uvc_entity_by_id() it global to the device. I think the proposed patch
is fine.
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 16:33, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> >
> > The list iterator will point to a bogus position containing HEAD if
> > the list is empty or the element is not found in list. This case
> > should be checked before any use of the iterator, otherwise it will
> > lead to a invalid memory access. The missing check here is before
> > "pin = iterm->id;", just add check here to fix the security bug.
> >
> > In addition, the list iterator value will *always* be set and non-NULL
> > by list_for_each_entry(), so it is incorrect to assume that the iterator
> > value will be NULL if the element is not found in list, considering
> > the (mis)use here: "if (iterm == NULL".
> >
> > Use a new value 'it' as the list iterator, while use the old value
> > 'iterm' as a dedicated pointer to point to the found element, which
> > 1. can fix this bug, due to 'iterm' is NULL only if it's not found.
> > 2. do not need to change all the uses of 'iterm' after the loop.
> > 3. can also limit the scope of the list iterator 'it' *only inside*
> > the traversal loop by simply declaring 'it' inside the loop in the
> > future, as usage of the iterator outside of the list_for_each_entry
> > is considered harmful. https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/2/17/1032
Looking forward to that :-)
> > Fixes: d5e90b7a6cd1c ("[media] uvcvideo: Move to video_ioctl2")
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > index 711556d13d03..e7cdc01ad277 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> > @@ -871,6 +871,7 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_enum_input(struct file *file, void *fh,
> > struct uvc_video_chain *chain = handle->chain;
> > const struct uvc_entity *selector = chain->selector;
> > struct uvc_entity *iterm = NULL;
> > + struct uvc_entity *it;
> > u32 index = input->index;
> > int pin = 0;
> >
> > @@ -878,22 +879,27 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_enum_input(struct file *file, void *fh,
> > (chain->dev->quirks & UVC_QUIRK_IGNORE_SELECTOR_UNIT)) {
> > if (index != 0)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > - list_for_each_entry(iterm, &chain->entities, chain) {
> > - if (UVC_ENTITY_IS_ITERM(iterm))
> > + list_for_each_entry(it, &chain->entities, chain) {
> > + if (UVC_ENTITY_IS_ITERM(it)) {
> > + iterm = it;
> > break;
> > + }
> > }
> > - pin = iterm->id;
> > + if (iterm)
> > + pin = iterm->id;
You can drop this, pin is not used anymore in the rest of the function.
> > } else if (index < selector->bNrInPins) {
> > pin = selector->baSourceID[index];
> > - list_for_each_entry(iterm, &chain->entities, chain) {
> > - if (!UVC_ENTITY_IS_ITERM(iterm))
> > + list_for_each_entry(it, &chain->entities, chain) {
> > + if (!UVC_ENTITY_IS_ITERM(it))
> > continue;
> > - if (iterm->id == pin)
> > + if (it->id == pin) {
And here you could use
if (it->id == selector->baSourceID[index]) {
and drop the local pin variable.
If you're fine with those small changes I can handle them when applying
the patch to my tree.
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> > + iterm = it;
> > break;
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - if (iterm == NULL || iterm->id != pin)
> > + if (iterm == NULL)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > memset(input, 0, sizeof(*input));
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-22 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-19 10:22 Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-22 12:40 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2022-03-22 13:10 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2022-03-26 7:00 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-29 5:09 ` Xiaomeng Tong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YjnKvQZot2wnljmW@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=ribalda@chromium.org \
--cc=xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®