From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] locking/local_lock: Pretend to use the per-CPU variable if not needed.
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 12:09:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yjr/9ATrCDxr/0hq@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YjrIDlUePHQtIV4K@linutronix.de>
In the !RT && !LOCKDEP case the per-CPU variables aren't used. The commit
mentioned below tried to avoid the usage of this_cpu_ptr() because it
generates code, clobbers registers which is not needed.
This change generated so little reference to the variable that llvm
assumed that it is not used and created a warning.
Revert local_lock_*() to its previous static inline implementation for
type checking.
Replace this_cpu_ptr() with __ll_cpu_ptr() which points to
this_cpu_ptr() when it is used.
In the !RT && !LOCKDEP case use per_cpu_ptr(, 0) which does not leave
any code behind and llvm does not complain either. It also ensures that
it is a per-CPU pointer. The assembly output in this case is unchanged.
Fixes: 9983a9d577db4 ("locking/local_lock: Make the empty local_lock_*() function a macro.")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/local_lock_internal.h | 21 ++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
index 6d635e8306d64..e671ead5fbad5 100644
--- a/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
+++ b/include/linux/local_lock_internal.h
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ typedef struct {
}, \
.owner = NULL,
+#define __ll_cpu_ptr(__ll_cpuptr) (this_cpu_ptr(__ll_cpuptr))
+
static inline void local_lock_acquire(local_lock_t *l)
{
lock_map_acquire(&l->dep_map);
@@ -44,9 +46,10 @@ static inline void local_lock_debug_init(local_lock_t *l)
}
#else /* CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
# define LOCAL_LOCK_DEBUG_INIT(lockname)
-# define local_lock_acquire(__ll) do { typecheck(local_lock_t *, __ll); } while (0)
-# define local_lock_release(__ll) do { typecheck(local_lock_t *, __ll); } while (0)
-# define local_lock_debug_init(__ll) do { typecheck(local_lock_t *, __ll); } while (0)
+# define __ll_cpu_ptr(__ll_cpuptr) per_cpu_ptr(__ll_cpuptr, 0)
+static inline void local_lock_acquire(local_lock_t *l) { }
+static inline void local_lock_release(local_lock_t *l) { }
+static inline void local_lock_debug_init(local_lock_t *l) { }
#endif /* !CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
#define INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(lockname) { LOCAL_LOCK_DEBUG_INIT(lockname) }
@@ -65,36 +68,36 @@ do { \
#define __local_lock(lock) \
do { \
preempt_disable(); \
- local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+ local_lock_acquire(__ll_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
} while (0)
#define __local_lock_irq(lock) \
do { \
local_irq_disable(); \
- local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+ local_lock_acquire(__ll_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
} while (0)
#define __local_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
do { \
local_irq_save(flags); \
- local_lock_acquire(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+ local_lock_acquire(__ll_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
} while (0)
#define __local_unlock(lock) \
do { \
- local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+ local_lock_release(__ll_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
preempt_enable(); \
} while (0)
#define __local_unlock_irq(lock) \
do { \
- local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+ local_lock_release(__ll_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
local_irq_enable(); \
} while (0)
#define __local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) \
do { \
- local_lock_release(this_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
+ local_lock_release(__ll_cpu_ptr(lock)); \
local_irq_restore(flags); \
} while (0)
--
2.35.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-23 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-21 11:11 [GIT PULL] locking changes for v5.18 Ingo Molnar
2022-03-22 22:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-22 22:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-03-22 22:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-23 7:11 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-23 11:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2022-03-23 17:17 ` [PATCH] locking/local_lock: Pretend to use the per-CPU variable if not needed Linus Torvalds
2022-03-24 17:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] Remove volatile from arch_raw_cpu_ptr() and revert the hacks Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-24 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/percpu: Remove volatile from arch_raw_cpu_ptr() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-24 17:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "locking/local_lock: Make the empty local_lock_*() function a macro." Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-24 17:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] Revert "mm/page_alloc: mark pagesets as __maybe_unused" Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-24 18:28 ` [PATCH 0/3] Remove volatile from arch_raw_cpu_ptr() and revert the hacks Linus Torvalds
2022-03-28 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-28 14:59 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-28 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-28 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/percpu: Remove volatile from arch_raw_cpu_ptr() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-04-05 8:28 ` [tip: locking/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-28 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Revert "locking/local_lock: Make the empty local_lock_*() function a macro." Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-04-05 8:28 ` [tip: locking/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-28 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Revert "mm/page_alloc: mark pagesets as __maybe_unused" Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-04-05 8:28 ` [tip: locking/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-03-23 11:21 ` [PATCH] x86/defconfig: Enable WERROR Borislav Petkov
2022-03-23 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-23 17:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-03-24 8:31 ` [PATCH] x86/config: Make the x86 defconfigs a bit more usable Ingo Molnar
2022-03-24 9:12 ` David Laight
2022-03-24 15:47 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-03-25 11:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-03-27 19:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-03-27 19:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-03-28 15:41 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-09-02 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-09-02 9:18 ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-09-04 9:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-09-05 2:16 ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-09-05 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <CAK7LNAQyiNpbLuVjjQ8-GOQECtfQZqsNS8xH0E2ZkLAHYtXt7A@mail.gmail.com>
2022-09-10 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-24 8:16 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/defconfig: Enable WERROR tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
2022-03-25 11:41 ` [GIT PULL] locking changes for v5.18 Andy Shevchenko
2022-03-25 12:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-25 13:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-03-25 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-25 17:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-03-22 22:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-22 23:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-24 8:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2022-03-24 10:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-03-24 23:19 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-03-22 23:27 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yjr/9ATrCDxr/0hq@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®