From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F62AC433F5 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 22:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231997AbiDFW1v (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 18:27:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41778 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229939AbiDFW1t (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 18:27:49 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E6E1208C13; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:25:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=MjQLm5nfhITl+A+kGiB/u0iJl9TpEsfjfRBNBNc7vN8=; b=tMmcIUHKkBdtg7T7s9K67UPUG7 zXuomUFHe0YMuv7OC+i6C02oSFzYR5lTRzE/SCn/ZgAeeRbjZSYL63VrRfSTlfaCHqtf3Kww/r59U YvF/F+NyYhAUBJK14kT7HaYa/VXBDxpFZdiKVtsOFbsAH5iudMS0IqiRQgS051UZAqI40pv1FNi5F fIBUltS2SKbJuM+4gD8fUBk9Cx/vOYkiqoYYI91Eh9cmGGiCp9Nf4m8cM/Ju/cdQ+YM2Hj7f9Fw3v J0rvG/sVLc6SKEyTk+JLybWl0XkVY5h+nGGxAReQSXVUF4+Zg1p5Fjwhp+FPE10J6lhGSmJZyiLRy NDvdlXzA==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ncE5w-0088EA-Jw; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 22:25:44 +0000 Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:25:44 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: tangmeng Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, yzaikin@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, nizhen@uniontech.com, zhanglianjie@uniontech.com, nixiaoming@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] fs/drop_caches: move drop_caches sysctls to its own file Message-ID: References: <20220221061018.10472-1-tangmeng@uniontech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: Luis Chamberlain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:48:06AM +0800, tangmeng wrote: > > > On 2022/2/27 05:02, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > > > Thanks but please send a v3 including all the other patches as well > > and collecting the Reviewed/Acked-bys, etc. This can be sent *after* > > your v3 of the optimization work. > > > I have noticed that there is a conflict between sysctl-next and linux-next. > Do I resubmit the patch based on linux-next, or after you deal with the > conflict between sysctl-next and linux-next, I resubmit based on > sysctl-next？ You can use sysctl-next now to base your development changes. Feel free to send more changes. Luis