Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH 3/5] fbdev: Restart conflicting fb removal loop when unregistering devices

[Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>]

On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:39:17PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Drivers that want to remove registered conflicting framebuffers prior to
> register their own framebuffer, calls remove_conflicting_framebuffers().
> 
> This function takes the registration_lock mutex, to prevent a races when
> drivers register framebuffer devices. But if a conflicting framebuffer
> device is found, the underlaying platform device is unregistered and this
> will lead to the platform driver .remove callback to be called, which in
> turn will call to the unregister_framebuffer() that takes the same lock.
> 
> To prevent this, a struct fb_info.forced_out field was used as indication
> to unregister_framebuffer() whether the mutex has to be grabbed or not.
> 
> A cleaner solution is to drop the lock before platform_device_unregister()
> so unregister_framebuffer() can take it when called from the fbdev driver,
> and just grab the lock again after the device has been registered and do
> a removal loop restart.
> 
> Since the framebuffer devices will already be removed, the loop would just
> finish when no more conflicting framebuffers are found.
> 
> Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>

It's always entertaining with these things since they can go boom in funny
ways, but need to a least try :-) Recursive locks are just a bit too evil.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

> ---
> 
>  drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
>  include/linux/fb.h               |  1 -
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> index b585339509b0..c1bfb8df9cba 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> @@ -1555,6 +1555,7 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> +restart_removal:
>  	/* check all firmware fbs and kick off if the base addr overlaps */
>  	for_each_registered_fb(i) {
>  		struct apertures_struct *gen_aper;
> @@ -1582,8 +1583,18 @@ static void do_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(struct apertures_struct *a,
>  			 * fix would add code to remove the device from the system.
>  			 */
>  			if (dev_is_platform(device)) {
> -				registered_fb[i]->forced_out = true;
> +				/*
> +				 * Drop the lock since the driver will call to the
> +				 * unregister_framebuffer() function that takes it.
> +				 */
> +				mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
>  				platform_device_unregister(to_platform_device(device));
> +				mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
> +				/*
> +				 * Restart the removal now that the platform device
> +				 * has been unregistered and its associated fb gone.
> +				 */
> +				goto restart_removal;
>  			} else {
>  				pr_warn("fb%d: cannot remove device\n", i);
>  				do_unregister_framebuffer(registered_fb[i]);
> @@ -1917,13 +1928,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_framebuffer);
>  void
>  unregister_framebuffer(struct fb_info *fb_info)
>  {
> -	bool forced_out = fb_info->forced_out;
> -
> -	if (!forced_out)
> -		mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
> +	mutex_lock(&registration_lock);
>  	do_unregister_framebuffer(fb_info);
> -	if (!forced_out)
> -		mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
> +	mutex_unlock(&registration_lock);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_framebuffer);
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/fb.h b/include/linux/fb.h
> index 39baa9a70779..f1e0cd751b06 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fb.h
> @@ -503,7 +503,6 @@ struct fb_info {
>  	} *apertures;
>  
>  	bool skip_vt_switch; /* no VT switch on suspend/resume required */
> -	bool forced_out; /* set when being removed by another driver */
>  };
>  
>  static inline struct apertures_struct *alloc_apertures(unsigned int max_num) {
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch