From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: get rid of stale fault injection code
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 14:20:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlSbqay8y6oaCxR6@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <778b1f04-a71b-a226-f7a7-4833fc9bf7c2@kernel.org>
On 04/11, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2022/4/6 11:01, Yufen Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2022/4/1 16:28, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > On 2022/4/1 15:19, Yufen Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> > > > Nowly, we can use new fault injection framework. Just delete the
> > > > stale fault injection code.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 2 +-
> > > > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 51 ++----------------------------------------
> > > > fs/f2fs/super.c | 53 --------------------------------------------
> > > > fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 23 -------------------
> > > > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-)
> > > >
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > break;
> > > > @@ -1963,14 +1920,6 @@ static int f2fs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root)
> > > > if (F2FS_IO_SIZE_BITS(sbi))
> > > > seq_printf(seq, ",io_bits=%u",
> > > > F2FS_OPTION(sbi).write_io_size_bits);
> > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION
> > > > - if (test_opt(sbi, FAULT_INJECTION)) {
> > > > - seq_printf(seq, ",fault_injection=%u",
> > > > - F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fault_info.inject_rate);
> > > > - seq_printf(seq, ",fault_type=%u",
> > > > - F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fault_info.inject_type);
> > > > - }
> > > > -#endif
> > >
> > > This will cause regression due to it breaks application usage w/ -o
> > > fault_* mountoption..., I don't think this is the right way.
> >
> >
> > Thanks for catching this. I admit it's a problem. But, IMO fault_* mount
> > option are mostly been used in test, not in actual product. So, I think
> > it may just affect some test applications. With the common fault injection
> > framework, it can be more easy and flexible to do fault injection test.
> > Therefore, I want to remove the two mount options directly.
> >
> > If you really worried about compatibility, how about just reserving the
> > two inject_* options but without doing any thing for them. We actually
> > configure fault injections by debugfs in this patch.
> >
> > Or do you have more better suggestion?
>
> Could you please consider to keep original logic of f2fs fault injection
> if user use inject_* options, otherwise following common fault injection
> framework?
>
> Thoughts?
I think it'd be useful to test roll-forward recovery flow by using those mount
options, since runtime fault injection cannot enable it during mount.
BTW, what is the real benefit to use the fault injection framework?
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yufen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-11 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-01 7:19 [PATCH 0/5] f2fs: try to use common fault injection framework Yufen Yu
2022-04-01 7:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] f2fs: extract f2fs root debugfs to init_f2fs_fs Yufen Yu
2022-04-01 7:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] f2fs: use common fault injection frmework Yufen Yu
2022-04-01 7:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] f2fs: replace function time_to_inject by f2fs_should_fail Yufen Yu
2022-04-01 7:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: get rid of stale fault injection code Yufen Yu
2022-04-01 8:28 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2022-04-06 3:01 ` Yufen Yu
2022-04-11 10:04 ` Chao Yu
2022-04-11 21:20 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2022-04-12 11:04 ` Yufen Yu
2022-04-19 2:56 ` Chao Yu
2022-04-01 7:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] f2fs: update doc for f2fs fault injection Yufen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YlSbqay8y6oaCxR6@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome