From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AAD6C433FE for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233740AbiDVSBd (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:01:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59260 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236621AbiDVR7e (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 13:59:34 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-xe36.google.com (mail-vs1-xe36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2274107834; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:56:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vs1-xe36.google.com with SMTP id t202so8134591vst.8; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:56:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=XxZBZ3stUkdhVW/utSJpsv4jrMoNhjVNY7NCi5QPbWU=; b=EeMR2o3WC1it+xKaAE3UcnjfygI28wLy1fn4KUlwq5rUdHXA3ogqmv0vTwBr0/yoz6 cDJzg1rfj241iv+2uzC/BYGGmTQnKA/47HSG40F4e3rn8DO/sTGjGLJRZKBNYcdc4SkJ VkxKM+/h5DcmnfD6wJ5B5PusUoozoXv2HxITbZos6wYa396jYdGaTuZm1sAUBzw7DwuF Vdb4koyAer9x2qkiNcMLqPOqC1r2BHVTFWFhhbVE4d70XYAPKDtci9NNSWGC9H/laxad B6pBvpciftuPkCUfsnr9UwtkqOowG6+yMOVvJAiLds17XVWjt2On7Tg7vNK/gpJ5LN5I UWqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=XxZBZ3stUkdhVW/utSJpsv4jrMoNhjVNY7NCi5QPbWU=; b=aVXQ8yM1rBzkIVZ9Ky8Lnso/IHhpxBsMw5VqZsdJrgiIc8HB0CSc1ioYp8RpA8bRW8 YCyzf2VElRrwN/ECc1OYr8NmxCjuUlp6TlaZZqjnumf7/OShAJTZkugZpjgr6qhembjC YH0t3GbQl6gSjr6t5a9Wm+PMJkmE1UUTpwt8XHQ1wc9DefL2M/cep1T6oLtkGSj08Pt0 6/JzbSgcNT3jIfz36nn7fLFEmdvXtaRfXt5K8CYebOXETNFOxahNMzi4dcouqvgtzLFq Ih7+rYmVv+X5sXQYbdfli8/XBXeTcvHerieVjMXADmiU21B+oeqV2T+rzHewLY+UhQ2L xFeA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532PfPjb0rboW2yAG4cpEZgEX6QiqgBGEAQyUO2OfB++ryq7jKtx 49QSlG15ygTrqcyqnoMnqvtvtCS/wWA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyo1Iq8/URCKrCCXfDfGEQSCogorOh8Sewv54X7ETtbR5vNrqWaSBhLNZmp149jqYMLD9zdlA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2405:b0:4e1:5008:adcc with SMTP id z5-20020a056a00240500b004e15008adccmr6135265pfh.35.1650649719093; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c090:400::5:b5ae]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x71-20020a62864a000000b0050ad2c24a39sm3358336pfd.205.2022.04.22.10.48.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:48:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Tejun Heo Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 07:48:36 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: David Vernet Cc: lizefan.x@bytedance.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cgroup: Introduce cpu controller test suite Message-ID: References: <20220422173349.3394844-1-void@manifault.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220422173349.3394844-1-void@manifault.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, David. On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 10:33:47AM -0700, David Vernet wrote: > This patchset introduces a new test_cpu.c test suite as part of > tools/testing/selftests/cgroup. test_cpu.c will contain testcases that > validate the cgroup v2 cpu controller. > > This patchset only contains testcases that validate cpu.stat and > cpu.weight, but I'm expecting to send further patchsets after this that > also include testcases that validate other knobs such as cpu.max. > > Note that checkpatch complains about a missing MAINTAINERS file entry for > [PATCH 1/4], but Roman Gushchin added that entry in a separate patchset: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220415000133.3955987-4-roman.gushchin@linux.dev/. Looks great to me. Thanks for adding the much needed selftests. Peter, if you're okay with it, imma route it through the cgroup tree. Thanks. -- tejun