From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] futex: Remove a PREEMPT_RT_FULL reference.
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 17:29:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnvWUvq1vpqCfCU7@linutronix.de> (raw)
Earlier the PREEMPT_RT patch had a PREEMPT_RT_FULL and PREEMPT_RT_BASE
Kconfig option. The latter was a subset the functionality that was
enabled with PREEMPT_RT_FULL and was mainly useful for debugging.
During the merging efforts the two Kconfig options were abandoned in the
v5.4.3-rt1 release and since then there is only PREEMPT_RT which enables
the full features set (as PREEMPT_RT_FULL did in earlier releases).
Replace the PREEMPT_RT_FULL reference with PREEMPT_RT.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/futex/pi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex/pi.c b/kernel/futex/pi.c
index 183b28c32c832..ce2889f123755 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/pi.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/pi.c
@@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ int futex_lock_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, ktime_t *time, int tryl
rt_mutex_init_waiter(&rt_waiter);
/*
- * On PREEMPT_RT_FULL, when hb->lock becomes an rt_mutex, we must not
+ * On PREEMPT_RT, when hb->lock becomes an rt_mutex, we must not
* hold it while doing rt_mutex_start_proxy(), because then it will
* include hb->lock in the blocking chain, even through we'll not in
* fact hold it while blocking. This will lead it to report -EDEADLK
--
2.36.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-05-11 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-11 15:29 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2022-05-11 17:54 ` André Almeida
2022-05-13 10:44 ` [tip: locking/core] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YnvWUvq1vpqCfCU7@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome