From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B791C433F5 for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 10:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234569AbiEXKoE (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2022 06:44:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55326 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229500AbiEXKoA (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2022 06:44:00 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C76A4F9C6; Tue, 24 May 2022 03:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB8CB61363; Tue, 24 May 2022 10:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E88A6C385AA; Tue, 24 May 2022 10:43:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1653389037; bh=jhPbs8emYF0nXYWVytdztWxnXXYI5JHKopXQu66KTmQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ElIrKa2LlJ6gPi7uCCLVLUIZsGQQ3NewLR4VHga7QyZADyrqSvyef3yNEGI6m8iHT EEPPFXg/gIWK66dTVAvfEVt3hyZvFH8zk71woB5h5oCWzA8ha8bZE82RW848rKMtJO 3SO4gYQaRqFBsdc0cHVfRw7w29fT89JvhvQdQaGKYunsVAWgBMaOmiLCg2qMNSZ7O+ YU9HeQrPCZWDJIPwVYyrynYpF7SuBWOY0+qV+yV3K3FOQ22NIjtV1Tq8n07RoCcOpK smElo26GoEGQ2tt24qnhw9Tj+zvC6ZvI5588lkxFfOFAZif/7Fk6yHvlZaQTpHWl4T ufE0cnbpBX3cg== Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 11:43:52 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Cristian Marussi Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, Andre Przywara Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest/arm64: signal: Skip SVE signal test if not enough VLs supported Message-ID: References: <20220524103149.2802-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ynI1P3Y53eRc+E0S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220524103149.2802-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> X-Cookie: A man's best friend is his dogma. Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ynI1P3Y53eRc+E0S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:31:49AM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > On platform where SVE is supported but there are less than 2 VLs available > the signal SVE change test should be skipped instead of failing. Reviewed-by: Mark Brown --ynI1P3Y53eRc+E0S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEyBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmKMtucACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DEOgf2L2ciymWK1hIY1vzSZb1GgHb7Ezhg0fijCetczE7exdXVCxuTP8r1E3Ev C7oGIxGDAjtk0Ma4lcmoHWp9SV/1ENX7MnB4NJxNtW+AtpmywCgFdrrwfyttTz9L XBtstlZFERvFVaMJOF/yIacHk7t6aPA/ZZb0SqKvtz3DhCMlQLAS4FztIJepd1H1 bRlyVjE94YSZPAnFW5Z7c9Et0jcgzWRENZPz5F+Gjcmh9A1wJxNrnkYZOh9d1bxA ATmEucMXeTTnvpg6EGrJV7StIRuGPfQXUYJs+XpC/nha/Q9KIoUk6JpAzw/x/iUZ nXh9CIxmXpdTOs4tNQXvYy47HLV3 =yMTg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ynI1P3Y53eRc+E0S--