Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/9] cpuidle: Move IRQ state validation

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 01:36:40PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 11:27:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Make cpuidle_enter_state() consistent with the s2idle variant and
> > verify ->enter() always returns with interrupts disabled.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c |   10 +++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> > @@ -234,7 +234,11 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_d
> >  	stop_critical_timings();
> >  	if (!(target_state->flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_RCU_IDLE))
> >  		rcu_idle_enter();
> > +
> >  	entered_state = target_state->enter(dev, drv, index);
> > +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled()))
> > +		raw_local_irq_disable();
> 
> So it means that idle functions are supposed to return with IRQs disabled
> without tracing, right? I can see that at least acpi_safe_halt() is using
> the non-raw local_irq_disable().

Yeah, I might need to re-order this. 0day also complained about that.
I'll need to find a moment to re-audit this and put it in the right
place.