From: asmadeus@codewreck.org
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
Cc: David Kahurani <k.kahurani@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, ericvh@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lucho@ionkov.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Subject: Re: 9p EBADF with cache enabled (Was: 9p fs-cache tests/benchmark (was: 9p fscache Duplicate cookie detected))
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 19:02:27 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqW5s+GQZwZ/DP5q@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3645230.Tf70N6zClz@silver>
Sorry, I had planned on working on this today but the other patchset
ended up taking all my time... I think I'm bad at priorities, this
is definitely important...
David, I think with the latest comments we made it should be relatively
straightforward to make netfs use the writeback fid? Could you find some
time to have a look? It should be trivial to reproduce, I gave these
commands a few mails ago (needs to run as a regular user, on a fscache mount)
---
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1M count=1
$ chmod 200 test
# drop cache or remount
$ dd if=/dev/urandom of=test bs=102 seek=2 count=1 conv=notrunc
dd: error writing 'test': Bad file descriptor
---
Otherwise I'll try to make some more 9p time again, but it's getting
more and more difficult for me...
Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 06:46:04PM +0200:
> I had another time slice on this issue today. As Dominique pointed out before,
> the writeback_fid was and still is opened with O_RDWR [fs/9p/fid.c]:
>
> struct p9_fid *v9fs_writeback_fid(struct dentry *dentry)
> {
> int err;
> struct p9_fid *fid, *ofid;
>
> ofid = v9fs_fid_lookup_with_uid(dentry, GLOBAL_ROOT_UID, 0);
> fid = clone_fid(ofid);
> if (IS_ERR(fid))
> goto error_out;
> p9_client_clunk(ofid);
> /*
> * writeback fid will only be used to write back the
> * dirty pages. We always request for the open fid in read-write
> * mode so that a partial page write which result in page
> * read can work.
> */
> err = p9_client_open(fid, O_RDWR);
> if (err < 0) {
> p9_client_clunk(fid);
> fid = ERR_PTR(err);
> goto error_out;
> }
> error_out:
> return fid;
> }
>
> The problem rather seems to be that the new netfs code does not use the
> writeback_fid when doing an implied read before the actual partial writeback.
>
> As I showed in my previous email, the old pre-netfs kernel versions also did a
> read before partial writebacks, but apparently used the special writeback_fid
> for that.
This looks good! Thanks for keeping it up.
>
> I added some trap code to recent netfs kernel version:
>
> diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
> index 8bba0d9cf975..11ff1ee2130e 100644
> --- a/net/9p/client.c
> +++ b/net/9p/client.c
> @@ -1549,12 +1549,21 @@ int p9_client_unlinkat(struct p9_fid *dfid, const char *name, int flags)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(p9_client_unlinkat);
>
> +void p9_bug(void) {
> + BUG_ON(true);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(p9_bug);
> +
> int
> p9_client_read(struct p9_fid *fid, u64 offset, struct iov_iter *to, int *err)
> {
> int total = 0;
> *err = 0;
>
> + if ((fid->mode & O_ACCMODE) == O_WRONLY) {
> + p9_bug();
> + }
> +
> while (iov_iter_count(to)) {
> int count;
>
> @@ -1648,6 +1657,10 @@ p9_client_write(struct p9_fid *fid, u64 offset, struct iov_iter *from, int *err)
> p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_9P, ">>> TWRITE fid %d offset %llu count %zd\n",
> fid->fid, offset, iov_iter_count(from));
>
> + if ((fid->mode & O_ACCMODE) == O_RDONLY) {
> + p9_bug();
> + }
> +
> while (iov_iter_count(from)) {
> int count = iov_iter_count(from);
> int rsize = fid->iounit;
>
> Which triggers the trap in p9_client_read() with cache=loose. Here is the
> backtrace [based on d615b5416f8a1afeb82d13b238f8152c572d59c0]:
>
> [ 139.365314] p9_client_read (net/9p/client.c:1553 net/9p/client.c:1564) 9pnet
> [ 139.148806] v9fs_issue_read (fs/9p/vfs_addr.c:45) 9p
> [ 139.149268] netfs_begin_read (fs/netfs/io.c:91 fs/netfs/io.c:579 fs/netfs/io.c:625) netfs
> [ 139.149725] ? xas_load (lib/xarray.c:211 lib/xarray.c:242)
> [ 139.150057] ? xa_load (lib/xarray.c:1469)
> [ 139.150398] netfs_write_begin (fs/netfs/buffered_read.c:407) netfs
> [ 139.150883] v9fs_write_begin (fs/9p/vfs_addr.c:279 (discriminator 2)) 9p
> [ 139.151293] generic_perform_write (mm/filemap.c:3789)
> [ 139.151721] ? generic_update_time (fs/inode.c:1858)
> [ 139.152112] ? file_update_time (fs/inode.c:2089)
> [ 139.152504] __generic_file_write_iter (mm/filemap.c:3916)
> [ 139.152943] generic_file_write_iter (./include/linux/fs.h:753 mm/filemap.c:3948)
> [ 139.153348] new_sync_write (fs/read_write.c:505 (discriminator 1))
> [ 139.153754] vfs_write (fs/read_write.c:591)
> [ 139.154090] ksys_write (fs/read_write.c:644)
> [ 139.154417] do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
> [ 139.154776] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:115)
>
> I still had not time to read the netfs code part yet, but I assume netfs falls
> back to a generic 9p read on the O_WRONLY opened fid here, instead of using
> the special O_RDWR opened 'writeback_fid'.
>
> Is there already some info available in the netfs API that the read is
> actually part of a writeback task, so that we could force on 9p driver level
> to use the special writeback_fid for the read in this case instead?
--
Dominique
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-12 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAAZOf26g-L2nSV-Siw6mwWQv1nv6on8c0fWqB4bKmX73QAFzow@mail.gmail.com>
2022-03-26 11:46 ` [syzbot] WARNING in p9_client_destroy David Kahurani
2022-03-26 11:48 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-03-26 12:24 ` asmadeus
2022-03-26 12:36 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-03-26 13:35 ` 9p fscache Duplicate cookie detected (Was: [syzbot] WARNING in p9_client_destroy) asmadeus
2022-03-30 12:21 ` 9p fs-cache tests/benchmark (was: 9p fscache Duplicate cookie detected) Christian Schoenebeck
2022-03-30 21:47 ` asmadeus
2022-04-01 14:19 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-01 23:11 ` asmadeus
2022-04-02 12:43 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-11 8:10 ` David Howells
2022-04-09 11:16 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-10 16:18 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-10 22:54 ` asmadeus
2022-04-11 13:41 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-12 22:38 ` asmadeus
2022-04-14 12:44 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-17 12:56 ` asmadeus
2022-04-17 13:52 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-17 21:22 ` asmadeus
2022-04-17 22:17 ` 9p EBADF with cache enabled (Was: 9p fs-cache tests/benchmark (was: 9p fscache Duplicate cookie detected)) asmadeus
2022-04-21 10:36 ` David Howells
2022-04-21 11:36 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-22 13:13 ` asmadeus
2022-04-25 14:10 ` David Howells
2022-04-26 15:38 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-05-03 10:21 ` asmadeus
2022-05-04 18:33 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-05-04 21:48 ` asmadeus
2022-05-06 19:14 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-03 16:46 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-12 10:02 ` asmadeus [this message]
2022-06-14 3:38 ` [PATCH] 9p: fix EBADF errors in cached mode Dominique Martinet
2022-06-14 3:41 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-06-14 12:10 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-14 12:45 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-06-14 14:11 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 13:35 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 13:51 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-06-16 14:11 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-06-16 20:14 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 20:53 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-06-16 21:10 ` [PATCH v3] " Dominique Martinet
2022-06-20 12:47 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-20 20:34 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-06-21 12:13 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-06-16 13:52 ` [PATCH v2] " Dominique Martinet
2022-04-11 7:59 ` 9p fs-cache tests/benchmark (was: 9p fscache Duplicate cookie detected) David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqW5s+GQZwZ/DP5q@codewreck.org \
--to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=k.kahurani@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome