mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Contextual conflict between kspp and rcu trees
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:35:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqpCkAVTwpNn+6p9@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202206151326.E34CDE453@keescook>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 01:28:00PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 12:55:53PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Per the above RCU commit and commit 6c5218715286 ("context_tracking:
> > Take IRQ eqs entrypoints over RCU"), it appears that the following diff
> > is the proper fix up. Would you mind applying it to the merge of
> > whichever tree comes second if possible? I did build and boot test it
> > but it would not be a bad idea for Sami and Frederic to verify that it
> > is correct so that Kees/Paul can mention it to Linus :)
> 
> Actually, the CFI fix (and a few others) are meant to be sent for
> -rc3, so if the ct_irq_enter() change is in -next, this can maybe get
> sorted out?

Ah, I had assumed that branch was destined for the next release. If it
is for 5.19 and they make -rc3 then it should be trivial for Paul to
either rebase the changes on -rc3 and apply that diff as part of
"context_tracking: Take IRQ eqs entrypoints over RCU" (if his tree is
mutable) or just merge -rc3 and apply that diff as part of the merge. I
don't really care how it gets resolved, just so long as it does :)

Cheers,
Nathan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15 20:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-15 19:55 Nathan Chancellor
2022-06-15 20:25 ` Kees Cook
2022-06-15 20:28 ` Kees Cook
2022-06-15 20:34   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-15 20:35   ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2022-06-15 21:12     ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-15 23:09       ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-15 20:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-15 23:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-16  1:26   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-16  1:40     ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YqpCkAVTwpNn+6p9@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®