From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@android.com, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Prevent kmemleak from accessing pKVM memory
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 18:51:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqtthvVxgQ6K0nEt@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220616161135.3997786-1-qperret@google.com>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 04:11:34PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> Commit a7259df76702 ("memblock: make memblock_find_in_range method
> private") changed the API using which memory is reserved for the pKVM
> hypervisor. However, it seems that memblock_phys_alloc() differs
> from the original API in terms of kmemleak semantics -- the old one
> excluded the reserved regions from kmemleak scans when the new one
> doesn't seem to. Unfortunately, when protected KVM is enabled, all
> kernel accesses to pKVM-private memory result in a fatal exception,
> which can now happen because of kmemleak scans:
>
> $ echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> [ 34.991354] kvm [304]: nVHE hyp BUG at: [<ffff800008fa3750>] __kvm_nvhe_handle_host_mem_abort+0x270/0x290!
> [ 34.991580] kvm [304]: Hyp Offset: 0xfffe8be807e00000
> [ 34.991813] Kernel panic - not syncing: HYP panic:
> [ 34.991813] PS:600003c9 PC:0000f418011a3750 ESR:00000000f2000800
> [ 34.991813] FAR:ffff000439200000 HPFAR:0000000004792000 PAR:0000000000000000
> [ 34.991813] VCPU:0000000000000000
> [ 34.993660] CPU: 0 PID: 304 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.19.0-rc2 #102
> [ 34.994059] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> [ 34.994452] Call trace:
> [ 34.994641] dump_backtrace.part.0+0xcc/0xe0
> [ 34.994932] show_stack+0x18/0x6c
> [ 34.995094] dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84
> [ 34.995276] dump_stack+0x18/0x34
> [ 34.995484] panic+0x16c/0x354
> [ 34.995673] __hyp_pgtable_total_pages+0x0/0x60
> [ 34.995933] scan_block+0x74/0x12c
> [ 34.996129] scan_gray_list+0xd8/0x19c
> [ 34.996332] kmemleak_scan+0x2c8/0x580
> [ 34.996535] kmemleak_write+0x340/0x4a0
> [ 34.996744] full_proxy_write+0x60/0xbc
> [ 34.996967] vfs_write+0xc4/0x2b0
> [ 34.997136] ksys_write+0x68/0xf4
> [ 34.997311] __arm64_sys_write+0x20/0x2c
> [ 34.997532] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114
> [ 34.997779] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x44/0xec
> [ 34.998029] do_el0_svc+0x2c/0xc0
> [ 34.998205] el0_svc+0x2c/0x84
> [ 34.998421] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf4/0x100
> [ 34.998653] el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190
> [ 34.999252] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
> [ 35.000034] Kernel Offset: disabled
> [ 35.000261] CPU features: 0x800,00007831,00001086
> [ 35.000642] Memory Limit: none
> [ 35.001329] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: HYP panic:
> [ 35.001329] PS:600003c9 PC:0000f418011a3750 ESR:00000000f2000800
> [ 35.001329] FAR:ffff000439200000 HPFAR:0000000004792000 PAR:0000000000000000
> [ 35.001329] VCPU:0000000000000000 ]---
>
> Fix this by explicitly excluding the hypervisor's memory pool from
> kmemleak like we already do for the hyp BSS.
>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
> Fixes: a7259df76702 ("memblock: make memblock_find_in_range method private")
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> ---
> An alternative could be to actually exclude memory allocated using
> memblock_phys_alloc_range() from kmemleak scans to revert back to the
> old behaviour. But nobody else has complained about this AFAIK, so I'd
> be inclined to keep this local to pKVM. No strong opinion.
This works for me, I haven't heard anyone else complaining.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-16 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-16 16:11 Quentin Perret
2022-06-16 17:51 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-06-17 8:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-06-17 8:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-06-17 8:38 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-06-17 8:45 ` Quentin Perret
2022-06-17 8:50 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqtthvVxgQ6K0nEt@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome