From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ftrace,objtool: PC32 based __mcount_loc
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 15:19:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrR2j74IWiGrUKFr@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXFuPAUfknadWDXPDXA5LYFnr0MGeXvF5MAYJBLxfCWEWw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 06:27:39PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 13:40, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:24:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I recently noticed that __mcount_loc is 64bit wide, containing absolute
> > > addresses. Since __mcount_loc is a permanent section (not one we drop
> > > after boot), this bloats the kernel memory usage for no real purpose.
> > >
> > > The below patch adds __mcount_loc_32 and objtool support to generate it.
> > > This saves, on an x86_64-defconfig + FTRACE, 23975*4 ~= 94K of permanent
> > > storage.
> >
> > We have a similar issue on arm64, which is exacerbated by needing ABS64
> > relocations (24 bytes per entry!) adding significant bloat when FTRACE is
> > enabled.
> >
> > It'd be really nice if going forwards compilers could expose an option to
> > generate PC32/PREL32 entries directly for this.
>
> As opposed to generating absolute references today? Or as opposed to
> having to rely on our own tooling?
Both; My prefrence would be the compiler had the option to generate these
entries as relative at compile-time, without needing a binary post-processing
step.
That said, from my PoV this is one of the things that I think it's somewhat
reasonable for objtool to do, as it's arguably akin to the build-time sort, and
doesn't require deep knowledge of the control flow, etc.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-23 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-17 11:24 Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-17 11:40 ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-21 16:27 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-06-23 14:19 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-06-22 14:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-06-23 14:21 ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-24 0:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-06-17 11:44 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-17 12:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-17 20:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-06-20 7:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-06-20 7:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-06-22 14:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-06-24 7:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrR2j74IWiGrUKFr@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®