From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF2DC433EF for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 10:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233251AbiGFKVN (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 06:21:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32786 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231921AbiGFKUv (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 06:20:51 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE5C28701; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 03:19:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id h14-20020a1ccc0e000000b0039eff745c53so8701869wmb.5; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 03:19:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=IRtZa4W50+1PL3vwAzMF6KhFeVCThCx8Lk3NGVi7seM=; b=lWDDpIfEx5ebFp2irfwkm9CCyzzmJiMkpYn3Ue9N8UMT/OCrEnaxVseXIhkIz+HSnt E3YOC/xNJ14iB3t97OMpBAw2LPvoOmWrNZi0FUM6QJUce2Ptq2EDewhsSN5u48A7ZfqE tFZ7lj51UQCj0td9G5MwbpGDSylsWYAiYv+IYngMYOOIPrWVLKc3dxcWPVVNRMuK7KyS lQAFPEHBmwvfqUbDkp0JHLO5PSO6dWlrzaE2oDAPp36Kl5iDhr4SbAfL32KU9D9qaehE ENwrr//muBtfbCfMghKgcytkczqPxW664gwJwYR1lZ6388pOd5Wy/mc6Ce56p+DriRS8 vD3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=IRtZa4W50+1PL3vwAzMF6KhFeVCThCx8Lk3NGVi7seM=; b=hz4TV48uccAFOZ8xrOCRERZklU6MrFhOptkCOvnpkOBpuZUYNFHoW8cf+BB2jZcoCE 3MPefHzpC9YquLt5SnRnpBdZhpuaf3E18M3XaLtzEQme0ovftQbkx9lG9kMxZztfqvOA HJlDLf5xHyTdfzHi+OKNr+5MAMXuoq6TzgHGJuyEUnFG4FaGHPPdUnhpPFBoTYpIQyWB QDYC0ZZBnkAQXS6k/sSFGAZzRlRUfY08D0XLK0o5WJImHkjavLDgUJ/sCjm4+8YG3oLr GDEsj8rwnlUSxJNeQvQo4jvYLdhAuKfZk2lbno92J/Bo7yE8dstol+IkU1gYmckcYcx4 QEiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/jL/M7FbqtyGNfXe6gWObQKbH63WmR5aLI62myhpVjZY2Ld2nB Jqa87s+lQ2rqLXHow10aOvI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1ubExqJXmOSHLAon3XHW+QSRBmtWllxIfYGEAnsyCqQdgC5xDGz5P6U6fqp2i7ewkT+Rp5Yrg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:19c8:b0:3a1:7399:861d with SMTP id u8-20020a05600c19c800b003a17399861dmr38802430wmq.170.1657102789374; Wed, 06 Jul 2022 03:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u3-20020a05600c210300b003a044fe7fe7sm25014451wml.9.2022.07.06.03.19.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Jul 2022 03:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 11:19:47 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/58] 5.4.204-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220705115610.236040773@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220705115610.236040773@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 01:57:36PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.204 release. > There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:55:56 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220627): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1456 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip