From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA21CCA479 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 18:12:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229604AbiGJSMg (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2022 14:12:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58468 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229495AbiGJSMf (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jul 2022 14:12:35 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F570A188; Sun, 10 Jul 2022 11:12:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1657476755; x=1689012755; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=kp/CSizk1lD3N+N92mt1x3FTwXV7OEfzLNstnxjIUno=; b=lRr42yzMLsp2cenaWspBAPkuCC+WsDtXhJjJsTo1pP96g9KCJUKCz3gz 7V0pW+E+R0rsv/0bbgPsq4uzTfOibpWe/rm9Pv8QhwFHG7Z4f4pIsiLCY wA6DpxXMH3RA+d8hq7kpP4WtPsXW1Ax1mNDm8MwFUvx7OFuE27e9MxdJ0 0kM9qaPdB4Xe0lL0pb7dxY++ZrJIP5KJpoLwBMoZzdgvCkFj87Os42ECG QdjhQQuyWZu9jQ+QLLgM3mMU3UpWWDXQ4paMMFlPQEZv7HIIJSk1AVWLr RqPvoRwtrz0YOJzr/VKNymMVOoWtA2shFE0cicuaMAeEMy8Iez8azaZ5o g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10404"; a="285657809" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.92,261,1650956400"; d="scan'208";a="285657809" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jul 2022 11:12:34 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.92,261,1650956400"; d="scan'208";a="621818834" Received: from agluck-desk3.sc.intel.com ([172.25.222.78]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jul 2022 11:12:34 -0700 Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 11:12:33 -0700 From: "Luck, Tony" To: Hans de Goede Cc: Jithu Joseph , markgross@kernel.org, ashok.raj@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Allow non-default names for IFS image Message-ID: References: <20220710160011.995800-1-jithu.joseph@intel.com> <535ccbeb-b6e5-b7ef-47b4-894af24c00b0@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <535ccbeb-b6e5-b7ef-47b4-894af24c00b0@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 06:12:44PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Not doing the initial load at module-load time will also speed-up > the module initialization and thus booting the system. Especially > on many-core servers this might make a measurable difference > in module-init time. The load is per-socket, not per core. So "many-core" doesn't matter as much as number of sockets. -Tony