From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DD9C19F29 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 03:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238598AbiHDDI5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2022 23:08:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51190 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229875AbiHDDIz (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2022 23:08:55 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C35F564E8; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 20:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id e8-20020a17090a280800b001f2fef7886eso4154765pjd.3; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 20:08:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=RHtZ1VlVkt6uu1M+FTMfyHpvjdn2kh4z4p+7clf3Kls=; b=RZz1ho6SmsSK/OBoUmBHWGW0BXgD4ngI543zvM0JJq9XlTE5t2eqhA+NzwKw/Kgs1k JP4DAWXjDEzLFxTSwE1OulpTw+aZCPk/y2/IczzZ7CoDCq4rvOxY7UJ1EdU13YJh/lYk hnCDKPYJAPWaho69qoBF6X6F9oH3k/dcTZWf6tmNhjI5fTXY0MjZMLEUrnYDsAXTHSAb 9IibCko4OFRxJQenDZE7rXlmaGbBRk013wCpxYa7qfcYSXUAq7DZeSF0dsf8XvReGSe6 kEY1N+d/4vSjPrbCXIxNMgLGt6khfQgBmcb2dqAjlbUN2I2bOwthjOpxsnbPGiahjNkr 3CWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=RHtZ1VlVkt6uu1M+FTMfyHpvjdn2kh4z4p+7clf3Kls=; b=FfX6toxm17Q4MVxeJf7PDBjktfyqJ/Jjabsl6pED+TFXpME+rK+4XaBGgwB7892V5w P3cwledMmJ3vY5+nd6UK6gOTm1+I6WL7u6JlEer0/GGikO40SKKwDbMeJduQsS7Wi9Re NDfBBis/8i3qhbtQdt8WiTSDEaR1nvtTnKXvq23p4HSU0XmRBlX8Tz4WTe3JACHMQiFL B0JRtQwrKkia7qjIZGZQNWhfIpMMXTICay1mG+7MS0KwW27ooB27/0BHFxDIp6lJH+7b zpmnExYQ9RIcRDPVfLTREQZ5mLxUjOv7bce9werunraIXSDvuQtaQ85XljHP4BwtLjfg x0WQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0SnOSBfiLvuc41ZL7HI4npef8lIUdOGZa+VVD1VieqWHPYF18T w8LDU+PPvZqzXXDMbJh1jIQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR58KPxALmmMGmhDfOdOUZVhgZbzWX8jvRQmk1ojWK85ZgTbwROt90oq7/EaArMjndtmKhdQpQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e543:b0:16f:23b5:9120 with SMTP id n3-20020a170902e54300b0016f23b59120mr2159060plf.30.1659582534048; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 20:08:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoboy.vegasvil.org ([2601:640:8200:33:e2d5:5eff:fea5:802f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 13-20020a17090a034d00b001f10c959aa2sm2383353pjf.42.2022.08.03.20.08.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Aug 2022 20:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 20:08:50 -0700 From: Richard Cochran To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Naveen Mamindlapalli , davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sgoutham@marvell.com Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 0/4] Add PTP support for CN10K silicon Message-ID: References: <20220730115758.16787-1-naveenm@marvell.com> <20220802121439.4d784f47@kernel.org> <20220802214420.10e3750f@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220802214420.10e3750f@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 09:44:20PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 12:14:39 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Jul 2022 17:27:54 +0530 Naveen Mamindlapalli wrote: > > > This patchset adds PTP support for CN10K silicon, specifically > > > to workaround few hardware issues and to add 1-step mode. > > > > Hi Richard, any thoughts on this one? We have to make a go/no-go > > decision on it for 6.0. > > Oh, well. These will have to wait until after the merge window then :( FWIW - I'm okay with any PTP patches that are about specific hardware drivers. When I can, I'll review them for proper use of the core layer, locking, etc, but at the end of the day, only the people holding the data sheet know how to talk to the hardware. Patches that touch the core layer are another story. These need careful review by me and other. (Obviously) Thanks, Richard