Re: [patch 1/2] speakup-dummy: Add support for PUNCT variable

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 06:10:25PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Greg KH, le jeu. 01 sept. 2022 16:59:28 +0200, a ecrit:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:25:02AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > This allows to debug the update of the punctuation level.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
> > > 
> > > Index: linux/drivers/accessibility/speakup/speakup_dummy.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux.orig/drivers/accessibility/speakup/speakup_dummy.c
> > > +++ linux/drivers/accessibility/speakup/speakup_dummy.c
> > > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static struct var_t vars[] = {
> > >  	{ INFLECTION, .u.n = {"INFLECTION %d\n", 8, 0, 16, 0, 0, NULL } },
> > >  	{ VOL, .u.n = {"VOL %d\n", 8, 0, 16, 0, 0, NULL } },
> > >  	{ TONE, .u.n = {"TONE %d\n", 8, 0, 16, 0, 0, NULL } },
> > > +	{ PUNCT, .u.n = {"PUNCT %d\n", 0, 0, 3, 0, 0, NULL } },
> > >  	{ DIRECT, .u.n = {NULL, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, NULL } },
> > >  	V_LAST_VAR
> > >  };
> > > @@ -42,6 +43,8 @@ static struct kobj_attribute pitch_attri
> > >  	__ATTR(pitch, 0644, spk_var_show, spk_var_store);
> > >  static struct kobj_attribute inflection_attribute =
> > >  	__ATTR(inflection, 0644, spk_var_show, spk_var_store);
> > > +static struct kobj_attribute punct_attribute =
> > > +	__ATTR(punct, 0644, spk_var_show, spk_var_store);
> > >  static struct kobj_attribute rate_attribute =
> > >  	__ATTR(rate, 0644, spk_var_show, spk_var_store);
> > >  static struct kobj_attribute tone_attribute =
> > > @@ -69,6 +72,7 @@ static struct attribute *synth_attrs[] =
> > >  	&caps_stop_attribute.attr,
> > >  	&pitch_attribute.attr,
> > >  	&inflection_attribute.attr,
> > > +	&punct_attribute.attr,
> > >  	&rate_attribute.attr,
> > >  	&tone_attribute.attr,
> > >  	&vol_attribute.attr,
> > > 
> > 
> > Don't we also need a Documentation/ABI/ update for this new sysfs file?
> 
> It is already there actually, because it's the same variables fo various
> syntheses, and this is just adding the support for punct (already known
> in other syntheses) to the dummy synthesis.

Ah, nevermind, thanks!