From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/math-emu: Remove -w build flag and fix warnings
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 09:11:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxIrRJz3+fkzogay@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220902155954.GP25951@gate.crashing.org>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 10:59:54AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 08:37:23AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 12:08:55PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > > This should have been detected by gcc at build time, but due to
> > > '-w' flag it went undetected.
> > >
> > > Removing that flag leads to many warnings hence errors.
>
> > Thanks for figuring out what was going on here! I took this patch for a
> > spin with clang and it has a few more errors around
> > -Wimplicit-fallthrough:
>
> Maybe add -Wno-implicit-fallthrough? This code is a copy from outside
> the kernel, no one has ever wanted to maintain it, if nothing else (the
> more politically correct formulation is "we cannot as easily pick up
> improvements from upstream if we modify stuff").
Sure, we could do something like this if you preferred:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile
index 26fef2e5672e..ed775747a2a5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/math-emu/Makefile
@@ -16,3 +16,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SPE) += math_efp.o
CFLAGS_fabs.o = -fno-builtin-fabs
CFLAGS_math.o = -fno-builtin-fabs
+
+ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
+ccflags-remove-y := $(CONFIG_CC_IMPLICIT_FALLTHROUGH)
+endif
At the same time, I see other modifications to these files that appear
to be for the kernel only so I suspect that this is already in the "we
cannot as easily pick up improvements from upstream" category,
regardless of that diff. No strong opinion from me, although I see
Christophe already included my suggestion in the most recent series:
https://lore.kernel.org/2663961738a46073713786d4efeb53100ca156e7.1662134272.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu/
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-02 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-02 10:08 [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/math_emu/efp: Include module.h Christophe Leroy
2022-09-02 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/math-emu: Remove -w build flag and fix warnings Christophe Leroy
2022-09-02 15:37 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-09-02 15:59 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-02 16:11 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-09-02 16:11 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2022-09-02 16:27 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-02 16:00 [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/math_emu/efp: Include module.h Christophe Leroy
2022-09-02 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/math-emu: Remove -w build flag and fix warnings Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YxIrRJz3+fkzogay@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®