From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: I/O page faults from 8250_mid PCIe UART after TIOCVHANGUP
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:15:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyF/dogp/0C87zLb@wantstofly.org> (raw)
Hi,
On an Intel SoC with several 8250_mid PCIe UARTs built into the CPU, I
can reliably trigger I/O page faults if I invoke TIOCVHANGUP on any of
the UARTs and then re-open that UART.
Invoking TIOCVHANGUP appears to clear the MSI address/data registers
in the UART via tty_ioctl() -> tty_vhangup() -> __tty_hangup() ->
uart_hangup() -> uart_shutdown() -> uart_port_shutdown() ->
univ8250_release_irq() -> free_irq() -> irq_domain_deactivate_irq() ->
__irq_domain_deactivate_irq() -> msi_domain_deactivate() ->
__pci_write_msi_msg():
[root@icelake ~]# lspci -s 00:1a.0 -vv | grep -A1 MSI:
Capabilities: [40] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
Address: fee00278 Data: 0000
[root@icelake ~]# cat hangup.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
ioctl(1, TIOCVHANGUP);
return 0;
}
[root@icelake ~]# gcc -Wall -o hangup hangup.c
[root@icelake ~]# ./hangup > /dev/ttyS4
[root@icelake ~]# lspci -s 00:1a.0 -vv | grep -A1 MSI:
Capabilities: [40] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit-
Address: 00000000 Data: 0000
[root@icelake ~]#
Opening the serial port device again while the UART is in this state
then appears to cause the UART to generate an interrupt before the
MSI vector has been set up again, causing a DMA write to I/O virtual
address zero:
[root@icelake console]# echo > /dev/ttyS4
[ 979.463307] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 3
[ 979.469409] DMAR: [DMA Write NO_PASID] Request device [00:1a.0] fault addr 0x0 [fault reason 0x05] PTE Write access is not set
I'm guessing there's something under tty_open() -> uart_open() ->
tty_port_open() -> uart_port_activate() -> uart_port_startup() ->
serial8250_do_startup() that triggers a UART interrupt before the
MSI vector has been set up again.
I did a quick search but it didn't seem like this is a known issue.
Thanks,
Lennert
next reply other threads:[~2022-09-14 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-14 7:15 Lennert Buytenhek [this message]
2022-09-14 10:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-09-14 11:10 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2022-09-14 13:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-09-15 16:27 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2022-09-16 11:47 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2022-09-16 12:02 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2022-09-16 13:18 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2022-09-19 13:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-09-19 14:19 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2022-09-19 14:22 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2022-09-19 13:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-09-19 14:12 ` Ilpo Järvinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YyF/dogp/0C87zLb@wantstofly.org \
--to=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®