From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA496C6FA8D for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:39:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230058AbiINJjA (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:39:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46998 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230214AbiINJi2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:38:28 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DC6A1CB17; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id bo13so8238307wrb.1; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:37:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=9ICPhAk7WSUuojPvhuOrCs4K3x58Me7hs8cZWGyAJus=; b=mk1Yv6cJkliM0V8wFmEUe/iffX+9lJuUXJQpCPcJz/NuiF4W5MCtQx/F5lKLsIf13N qjDRKkRXb7Uz3h4Qwjvi3oNEW6UiaE46LHNo+q2md7D34mE943/oZjuWjuBlf80usrbf jz+C6UXX3Ig4UPtDA+WDBjykKQafKKbYCNrwlhlugGru4i8+q/6Yu03bJ5Zl0XmugQu7 Sd64tw5QQgczkraFEHhHUxyCSv9LkqR6e85sZu5tWDmjl8LVS0w6+SRVaib5rLefGkp2 rycahVQpmz/0rNlrpebOb+XZL9qpIc/DG3KHMO6hLJ36lRGy9neM9QPiJM7bQkqLgIz/ IbkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=9ICPhAk7WSUuojPvhuOrCs4K3x58Me7hs8cZWGyAJus=; b=UQ9E/HG8f6vQoLzPGWqDEQBk+FlGSk5yzc2COdD0Vc214YXIAcqIMfZFmq4zWsBFlS qtOhczkoSxBLpxIHAp6jy2mTq270BdgsvN8qYT60a/Q4jCdXog3SvUmR5gnSswU8v6b1 IW5H2/hcVE7mrfneXW8iuP2vNJFrrSE0uDouZP1ltEt4QY7d0KxRjJgIdsascOq5Vf3p u4VfLItAlQhv4hnqOXVsjubdyYrP+516Ev3DWvbnOGgQDBqqZCAgmXpXyksrtyIAebjt 9CPT/hQ1LCjkUNqRZCOjHGdOfHBy5JBOXkDlOTAYQYsVIAp0bZq2HuIr7XUsFI4YWhR6 2YBA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0j+pIgj+nMS96AxV4b1ZjGXRoZci5+Ar3NAN12IDpVm19tT6Ro c/BtA/NV+5juPwc4Gh/Ek/sjrnZ0HlA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR41v9glYIS6dOa+YPWh2Bjpb9yAI3k4G9HdagQvZAFBM+A6DoViLRJ3lZac9fbXlFUnHJi69g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:d1ce:0:b0:22a:36d6:da05 with SMTP id b14-20020adfd1ce000000b0022a36d6da05mr17331989wrd.719.1663148270787; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f12-20020a05600c154c00b003a5f3f5883dsm18853027wmg.17.2022.09.14.02.37.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:37:48 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/108] 5.4.212-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220913140353.549108748@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220913140353.549108748@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:05:31PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.212 release. > There are 108 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Sep 2022 14:03:27 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1829 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip