From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22EDECAAD3 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230128AbiINJlm (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:41:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56318 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231343AbiINJlG (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:41:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12ABB6257; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id r66-20020a1c4445000000b003b494ffc00bso2589865wma.0; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:40:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=XD4iucFLxgzqc21UBjYM/+y/OF171eyd76SQF2Uz+Uo=; b=Czzyg5Ii39bIdATod6MYoXL+0ce1NHBJMEk5TXZlBfgIm8ER3DsZC6h4FuXBm2TArw ahIrgNi083lSn5WMJocUb612EwQfUxM/QifkRkx2M08u2VpJ0wQ8VjeE9YUHBR2vOesw l1dxRUn6Haq+w0PZv2tSSi2mmwdZLIbmZxW5zf03GEYOZVfmnfDSWDF1cQE2FFcagrgO ld62sKv5+mybj6HNRhW9L+yGTSriIKBHC1eHfgwUb71y3WS3s5g3Qugxq4cp51ThXNdz CPWl+ebblrUq0EWj65OGURHb4M1+2/eRZv7HhWTiRvQ3oyrFfpHliFYZpWIBIEA/ULRn cGSA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=XD4iucFLxgzqc21UBjYM/+y/OF171eyd76SQF2Uz+Uo=; b=yvIpADFUkSh1IriEnQlL4bLoYnWsHcnv842VxwXbZieAqK28njatYvEva1p7zRE5ea m9GsANVWC2G0kLcdBTtr9pTBKV2nNqut8+Yk6Saj6X9ehPcefvu2+ALIy4GcykZ09bix Kw+7JLOyyBaOYe2n8drao6yRqrUmX6cWiw028TaEv1N4ul7ec3fNlfib1ge/7rpaASNK ++y3jNSqM5HvXdpvu1FZoBoP9r/hLSDVSKTNyLowiQx/IxzBHgAgVZA16DfovGhvIxnl 4QEq+miD5XQkT+O3K9WtvPSmQI30ab3ZrRQfLfraPnOYU2AIddNd53LOOADkBN40HnY/ jivA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0cjSUrItdhppHwVJmv8TWshSP65R0dayiQSJ3RpNHnBzZhPU7J RqHupPBe8KWEvihMAegqzu4z1Tovr6c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4a8T838OGuXPNJH58/mS7gzcHZP9BkO9ZJV29Q+dpwCsDZK5c2tOKebo4VXYuWV41KLkN6nA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c05:b0:3b4:9504:9904 with SMTP id j5-20020a05600c1c0500b003b495049904mr2413030wms.69.1663148435548; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f7-20020a5d4dc7000000b00226dba960b4sm13107772wru.3.2022.09.14.02.40.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 02:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:40:33 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/121] 5.15.68-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220913140357.323297659@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220913140357.323297659@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 04:03:11PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.68 release. > There are 121 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 15 Sep 2022 14:03:27 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220819): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1819 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1825 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1827 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip