From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AD0ECAAA1 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230230AbiISReh (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 13:34:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43996 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230118AbiISRec (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 13:34:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B2E1B60 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:34:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id f193so48515pgc.0 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:34:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=nbeqKeqU+tUuP9XT9zRql4nhIwFjZS/czFo4J2py6fk=; b=Nd9P/O4JXfy5MV6T5aozJFl2P2K8ng5xh8qL+RLCJQPl+i1vZk5tU8fCFAcM/IlJ6M xyZ2ONC/WReLyOTlhIFCw9B+xR8lFynmR2YGNNl8mTBXNrnzN2YeEvnGgurj1beFPXhW UKyaoWjBAZtSm8ODJ2uVVgJ9nWJpK2DCVF2WOg1qNSH2Gr3YzVyrzA42BU9ePq9tYbdS QI6kRtv4KzozU08CS3QG+MeozLhf7wciygDPUwDQZ64ay+BLklH0NV33+PPOYLMS22NV i6gScaUTCDbLlQsU3hdnY4nkcy+jPCLMg//TZDGNgLk0ShJ7vKW1XtE7sLkMktEk0qtF dRqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=nbeqKeqU+tUuP9XT9zRql4nhIwFjZS/czFo4J2py6fk=; b=WKv4i4wgjLtjR7mUzkaqU9b3WbfwAZj10YxAB18glFy/iQY4Ebd11na8yj0N2HJ8F3 9TLWAkDlmR4RaBgRhUndhMzlozuUwc7UA/cN6AXPF39hlZYr529C8rbN30UsX0kVEXFg HyGyUUNAKybOu6I5K4KKOfhHWePFrrWpr1sTt71uiw+hL1wLX4gBdqLNYw3sA/2PxIfe BuHlRvcvMO3YhpLphy4ItOdW5A3f81AzGtEqcOd2zimCw3qTeYUntZeebFTZaayvZtTh EG76Qdb80OY3kJ8Qk/ai+rG+xNA1mSFd/2U2BsAz1NqPGOHPULnTOn8+CDR/U6PQpugi +9Kw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1v9kCoZUncMZBOsx3S+JeRm27P4DJmvleqvwxM0SelK54xdJ39 cToUTgxeBcsB/E1Vuv2CNH0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM52ZpcwiFXZ6jg8bIc6f7QSIyDiokWStRV6bcVGjHRvcELy1H0Sukf00Su9ePRl0gRVZKwiYw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:198e:b0:541:f85a:6c27 with SMTP id d14-20020a056a00198e00b00541f85a6c27mr19375564pfl.81.1663608868727; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:34:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (2603-800c-1a02-1bae-a7fa-157f-969a-4cde.res6.spectrum.com. [2603:800c:1a02:1bae:a7fa:157f:969a:4cde]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h4-20020a170902680400b001789f6744b8sm2960161plk.214.2022.09.19.10.34.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:34:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Tejun Heo Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 07:34:27 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Vincent Guittot Cc: Dietmar Eggemann , mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parth@linux.ibm.com, qais.yousef@arm.com, chris.hyser@oracle.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, David.Laight@aculab.com, pjt@google.com, pavel@ucw.cz, qperret@google.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, joshdon@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] sched/fair: Add sched group latency support Message-ID: References: <20220916080305.29574-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20220916080305.29574-7-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <000c2893-feb4-373d-2234-2ca74be94714@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 05:49:27PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > For `nice` we have `cpu.weight.nice` next to `cpu.weight` in cgroup v2 ? > > If everybody is ok, I can add back the cpu.latency.nice interface in > the v5 in addition to the cpu.latency Yeah, that sounds fine to me. Thanks. -- tejun