From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix missing SIGTRAPs
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 11:37:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yz/zXpF1yLshrJm/@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yz78MMMJ74tBw0gu@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 06:02PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This can happen if we get two consecutive event_sched_out() and both
> instances will have pending_sigtrap set. This can happen when the event
> that has sigtrap set also triggers in kernel space.
>
> You then get task_work list corruption and *boom*.
>
> I'm thinking the below might be the simplest solution; we can only send
> a single signal after all.
That worked. In addition I had to disable the ctx->task != current check
if we're in task_work, because presumably the event might have already
been disabled/moved??
At least with all the below fixups, things seem to work (tests +
light fuzzing).
Thanks,
-- Marco
------ >8 ------
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 9319af6013f1..29ed6e58906b 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2285,9 +2285,10 @@ event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event,
*/
local_dec(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
} else {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(event->pending_work);
- event->pending_work = 1;
- task_work_add(current, &event->pending_task, TWA_RESUME);
+ if (!event->pending_work) {
+ event->pending_work = 1;
+ task_work_add(current, &event->pending_task, TWA_RESUME);
+ }
}
}
@@ -6455,18 +6456,19 @@ void perf_event_wakeup(struct perf_event *event)
}
}
-static void perf_sigtrap(struct perf_event *event)
+static void perf_sigtrap(struct perf_event *event, bool in_task_work)
{
/*
* We'd expect this to only occur if the irq_work is delayed and either
* ctx->task or current has changed in the meantime. This can be the
* case on architectures that do not implement arch_irq_work_raise().
*/
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(event->ctx->task != current))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task_work && event->ctx->task != current))
return;
/*
- * perf_pending_irq() can race with the task exiting.
+ * Both perf_pending_task() and perf_pending_irq() can race with the
+ * task exiting.
*/
if (current->flags & PF_EXITING)
return;
@@ -6496,7 +6498,7 @@ static void __perf_pending_irq(struct perf_event *event)
if (event->pending_sigtrap) {
event->pending_sigtrap = 0;
local_dec(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
- perf_sigtrap(event);
+ perf_sigtrap(event, false);
}
if (event->pending_disable) {
event->pending_disable = 0;
@@ -6563,16 +6565,18 @@ static void perf_pending_task(struct callback_head *head)
* If we 'fail' here, that's OK, it means recursion is already disabled
* and we won't recurse 'further'.
*/
+ preempt_disable_notrace();
rctx = perf_swevent_get_recursion_context();
if (event->pending_work) {
event->pending_work = 0;
local_dec(&event->ctx->nr_pending);
- perf_sigtrap(event);
+ perf_sigtrap(event, true);
}
if (rctx >= 0)
perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(rctx);
+ preempt_enable_notrace();
}
#ifdef CONFIG_GUEST_PERF_EVENTS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-07 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-27 12:13 [PATCH] perf: Fix missing SIGTRAPs due to pending_disable abuse Marco Elver
2022-09-27 12:30 ` Marco Elver
2022-09-27 18:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-27 21:45 ` Marco Elver
2022-09-28 10:06 ` Marco Elver
2022-09-28 14:55 ` Marco Elver
2022-10-04 17:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-04 17:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-04 17:33 ` Marco Elver
2022-10-05 7:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-05 7:49 ` Marco Elver
2022-10-05 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 13:33 ` [PATCH] perf: Fix missing SIGTRAPs Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 13:59 ` Marco Elver
2022-10-06 16:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-07 9:37 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2022-10-07 13:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-07 13:58 ` Marco Elver
2022-10-07 16:14 ` Marco Elver
2022-10-08 8:41 ` Marco Elver
2022-10-08 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-10 20:52 ` Marco Elver
2022-10-08 13:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-08 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-11 7:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-11 12:58 ` Marco Elver
2022-10-11 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yz/zXpF1yLshrJm/@elver.google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome