From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45D4C07E9D for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231219AbiI0LDK (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:03:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56040 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229834AbiI0LCW (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 07:02:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FAB95A81C; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 04:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id t14so14389340wrx.8; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 04:01:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=2reUqdIRFgcRPEcMeMvzedhfWPPf1EFjIomaQIVguU4=; b=PYfn5q+xtghjKSxJvzwkajwxx9l+D/ql9u7tcY/fivEG1MwY8CEf+lh4REjSxDsqoy fdTeLivEeLL0srJd2M1kC82mNNJPkCvsmCVlK9KNyGiYbkoLI+it9oHSbJfGHv6Nu5n2 wvwgKrRum9QgY4jDXYTBXLfxsjGumngXL6mufHMe2JfOuJki6+Kn1r7YqhEvJckZ2u5d 6f/6sHfUqTXIUEw0DpVmX7cPz7jwzO02iIdZagUlUn84uDk5hLE0zgCKTYZLZ3E6Mh0V n78tmL9rUI7M3kEnc7iRnqA45cqigpdzNklJ82qq/d1cO92hy62m75Hubkon4F1ggdgl uTGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=2reUqdIRFgcRPEcMeMvzedhfWPPf1EFjIomaQIVguU4=; b=8LXUIndLi6hcO1hXR7akA85PSVc7ILzV1QPZ7P3TUe3y9Ijel3qk3MCQRcgVONjY2Y 6gC2JN2wzSGccmdHo67VDSNxo5PrcNIhiAO1AAzdRJUYQzAqboef1JM7DwRppU9dtvcq T21IIvtuPBQHJE3AFMohU8Cj651sxV4EqQlt0CinK4DMKVzMYLs5OhOvS3re3L/rkZoX oqKsuAr3OobcaZSoenN4WPR8l7vzl8r+UaH1+qiZIaSLrDAKI+rzSl+oprkAMlk4rRf/ I9JVYb1f1o5e/8NQnnW1dCIlCPVxyYSjsQ+ZaUk7+cQseoHEd9VBc7krs1rSQNZ9FT+V OL7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf031vbuiZ7fDgCMikgyLDbdojC3h4UyHO4nuqe6PDpELnaJJWF4 MQ7CSgaVW4banQ0PRiZUw7g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4tKkTbVp7eyXuaZS/S1+jxXUVB+AVUXyfJLP68ckv0ilsKESh4p221QsK2DN/X2GH8u3jW2g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:cd0c:0:b0:22c:bf18:2cf6 with SMTP id w12-20020adfcd0c000000b0022cbf182cf6mr1335336wrm.170.1664276509968; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 04:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r7-20020adfda47000000b0021e51c039c5sm1484799wrl.80.2022.09.27.04.01.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 04:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:01:46 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/115] 5.4.215-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20220926163546.791705298@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220926163546.791705298@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 06:36:49PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.215 release. > There are 115 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 28 Sep 2022 16:35:25 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220925): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1904 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip