From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BD4C04A95 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 10:46:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233627AbiI1Kqg (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:46:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52068 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231920AbiI1Kqe (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:46:34 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1903ABD43 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 03:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3897D143D; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 03:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FVFF77S0Q05N (unknown [10.57.80.218]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F85C3F792; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 03:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:46:25 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Will Deacon , catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64 fixes for -rc7 Message-ID: References: <20220923182800.GA14450@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 03:43:05PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 11:28 AM Will Deacon wrote: > > > > Please pull these arm64 fixes for -rc7. They're all very simple and > > self-contained, although the CFI jump-table fix touches the generic > > linker script as that's where the problematic macro lives. > > The commit message is a bit confusing. It talks about "hysterical > raisins on x86", but CONFIG_CFI_CLANG has always been arm64-only. No? > > So I'm not seeing what the x86 comment is about? It was a an accidental inclusion inthe ARM64 CFI series while x86 CFI support was being developed; in the thread in the LINK tage, Sami says: | This was a leftover from an old x86 series, which was included here by | mistake. Will also asked me about this a couple of weeks ago, I think, and | said he'd send a patch to remove it. The relevant message being: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CABCJKufrRCb84fafhsR8_fftBLv0_pvufL_ZZieUSTJfhdT+fw@mail.gmail.com/ Thanks, Mark.