Re: [GIT PULL] objtool fixes and updates

[Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>]

On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 02:36:49PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 08:31:08PM +0800, Philip Li wrote:
> > For 0a7fb6f07e3a, the bot only reported 2 times on x86 [1][2]. For this
> > loongarch report, the bisection is wrong and is a false positive, I will
> > further check. Meanwhile, the bot will ignore the bisection of this new
> > objtool message as it is not really a new kernel issue.
> 
> Can you guys get a human being to double-check and vet those reports?! Please!

Really sorry, we will add more strict check of objtool warnings. We have
logic to detect the low confidence one and send to https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild/
for manual check before sending out. But there's still case that we fail to
detect.

> 
> Because we kinda trust them but
> 
> 1. they're not really helpful and hard to understand what you're reporting
> 
> 2. that summary thing is especially useless:
> 
> "Error/Warning ids grouped by kconfigs:
> 
> recent_errors
> `-- loongarch-randconfig-001-20250328
>     `-- arch-loongarch-kernel-traps.o:warning:objtool:show_stack:skipping-duplicate-warning(s)"
> 
> When I see this, I need to go look for the original reports and somehow
> scratch them together. And you have all that info, why don't you simply dump
> a URL with the bug materials so that one can inspect them?

I will also check this as it is designed to have link together with reported
error in the summary. It is another bug that the bot should be fixed.

> 
> 3. Last but not least, if this doesn't change I will start ignoring them.
>    Because they're not really helping - on the contrary - they're actively
>    interfering.

Apologize again, we will continue improving the bot to make it really useful.

> 
> Thx.
> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette