From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Changwoo Min <multics69@gmail.com>
Cc: void@manifault.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
changwoo@igalia.com, kernel-dev@igalia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] sched_ext: Manage the validity of scx_rq_clock
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 13:26:00 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0-TiGC5eUg4ZMWT@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241203142802.36305-3-changwoo@igalia.com>
Hello,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 11:27:59PM +0900, Changwoo Min wrote:
> An rq clock becomes valid when it is updated using update_rq_clock()
> and invalidated when the rq is unlocked using rq_unpin_lock(). Also,
> after long-running operations -- ops.running() and ops.update_idle() --
> in a BPF scheduler, the sched_ext core invalidates the rq clock.
Hmm... why are ops.running() or ops.update_idle() special? ie. How does
sched_ext core determine what are long-running and what are not.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-03 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-03 14:27 [PATCH v3 0/5] sched_ext: Support high-performance monotonically non-decreasing clock Changwoo Min
2024-12-03 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] sched_ext: Implement scx_rq_clock_update/stale() Changwoo Min
2024-12-03 23:23 ` Tejun Heo
2024-12-04 1:28 ` Changwoo Min
2024-12-03 14:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] sched_ext: Manage the validity of scx_rq_clock Changwoo Min
2024-12-03 23:26 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-12-04 1:42 ` Changwoo Min
2024-12-04 18:46 ` Tejun Heo
2024-12-06 1:50 ` Changwoo Min
2024-12-03 14:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] sched_ext: Implement scx_bpf_clock_get_ns() Changwoo Min
2024-12-03 23:37 ` Tejun Heo
2024-12-04 5:17 ` Changwoo Min
2024-12-03 14:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] sched_ext: Add scx_bpf_clock_get_ns() for BPF scheduler Changwoo Min
2024-12-03 14:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] sched_ext: Replace bpf_ktime_get_ns() to scx_bpf_clock_get_ns() Changwoo Min
2024-12-03 23:40 ` Tejun Heo
2024-12-04 5:41 ` Changwoo Min
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z0-TiGC5eUg4ZMWT@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=multics69@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®