Re: [PATCH] fujitsu-laptop: replace strcpy -> strscpy

[Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net>]

On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 02:07:07AM +0530, Abdul Rahim wrote:
> strcpy() performs no bounds checking on the destination buffer. This
> could result in linear overflows beyond the end of the buffer, leading
> to all kinds of misbehaviors.[1]
> 
> [1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strcpy
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> index ae992ac1ab4a..a0eae24ca9e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop.c
> @@ -505,8 +505,8 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_bl_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	fujitsu_bl = priv;
> -	strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_FUJITSU_BL_DEVICE_NAME);
> -	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_FUJITSU_CLASS);
> +	strscpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_FUJITSU_BL_DEVICE_NAME);
> +	strscpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_FUJITSU_CLASS);
>  	device->driver_data = priv;
>  
>  	pr_info("ACPI: %s [%s]\n",
> @@ -891,8 +891,8 @@ static int acpi_fujitsu_laptop_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>  	WARN_ONCE(fext, "More than one FUJ02E3 ACPI device was found.  Driver may not work as intended.");
>  	fext = device;
>  
> -	strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_FUJITSU_LAPTOP_DEVICE_NAME);
> -	strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_FUJITSU_CLASS);
> +	strscpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_FUJITSU_LAPTOP_DEVICE_NAME);
> +	strscpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_FUJITSU_CLASS);
>  	device->driver_data = priv;
>  
>  	/* kfifo */

This looks good to me and is a useful improvement.  Thanks!

Acked-by: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net>