From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA5DFAD4B; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732822448; cv=none; b=lW76/d2wKm35+WAsiPprn51nNQcn+3nHVZYUroTXCJekLRMZAJqUtpM9ppaCH7PGCGBAmOyQ8mGwiiJtJsYMVqzq879rMrJ3Nj1a5UCn2HSpduori0gNgrybW3e7vrC89yTH+K89cGsVz57LVY3zK6Td8OJOg0d7ZWIZyzxllaY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732822448; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gseeCWqiEmclO5yM18nYwsG024dsDV4mFg8cAeAR2sU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GFpEFM+PDc16Zf7ComUAuglrfd6Z247SZK2gXUpHkn1ZwYSOLR/i77zvHotQ17s9vYwP6vPx7ObtBYsc83/n3jdcDUQt5OGK5LotFHa6OZxpRDSare6hNDah9MEhYl10Nvo+8jg0j1/SzFWoRjEmkWuAbXK+jzk6ygeiCl7SEMI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=O9W5VNT7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="O9W5VNT7" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D21A5C4CECE; Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:34:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1732822448; bh=gseeCWqiEmclO5yM18nYwsG024dsDV4mFg8cAeAR2sU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=O9W5VNT7lC8p4Hi3gt79K5IovXmLguJOnCMwKxo52CcOVghHfSNHcLXOC4ibPgUt0 5DrDKxIZIHVSDHIqjCws199DcUUfiJrSlAbxayZBFVqrprGMwD7fPOaQvwhg1YVHBE QBE38G7/T9zeNR1zuZz9WxUeJ0ZJZwLT4yncG4niW+J4KV1pyNajMuV8dVrdGeREhJ +ADIv762rtwMTRcpwzF/UisWkkYKMny3r48wLIn85I1CwJlopzUOUIljZbBHUGj7Ia tkir2vw0jOsutipdE5enupTzfwxsgjU320fYnNvUPOqcE1LSyjLQcsnz7eCvqQJJxn PTe0vPBtlnI2g== Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:34:06 -0800 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, petr.pavlu@suse.com, samitolvanen@google.com, da.gomez@samsung.com, masahiroy@kernel.org, deller@gmx.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, kris.van.hees@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selftests: add new kallsyms selftests Message-ID: References: <20241021193310.2014131-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 03:10:34PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Despite the warning, I gave this a try on m68k (cross-compiled on i7 ;-). > However, I didn't notice any extra-ordinary build times. I had some large values before this got merged and due to this slowing down builds 2x I reduced the defaults. The current defaults are no known as TEST_KALLSYMS_LARGE. > Also, when running the test manually on ARAnyM, everything runs > in the blink of an eye. I didn't use the script, but ran all commands > manually. I tried insmodding a/b/c/d, c/a/b, a/c/d/b. > > Is this expected? I tried to clarify the ranges known we can use to mess with this test a bit more in the recent fixes on modules-next [0] so since you want to see some things blow up try TEST_KALLSYMS_MAX, on some systems this is reported to crash the build. It is why I had reduced the original values a bit... [0] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/modules/linux.git modules-next Luis