From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB7804A21 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734090385; cv=none; b=Om69BYdLRYDcgQj+LS8raUqRDL1aq7BoUCrW55SbX3nvptbvGw1USgHpH/6SNzlQgTf66DlAJ9f0e3x9zegxb7lNp6oaN6xY5F533mZogszVU4kHczZUbFYkG96EbIkZCAOHzzgyarOxZvukSGOcKkJq2Mqn+SHLedyOXICi1Cg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734090385; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1LJTjOx7kJx7q2mytF+grEPfxYG6mPmq7VZvVuE7Nzg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YvEEj+5HTqeBRNSb0CZ1fwi0EuJMmeWQUb3ins+5UVTiw8FpbDJwIdoMYzPyZAKwHxX5cRCVa2iEHAm2Y3rXMQO/yZKEFEJ/MRQUbxO8W98kTR0KWzZ3SoYPulU+pbFmS20MRbx5ypDYTUxM7I+EpypL5a5ucTSTb5FbQvFiFeM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Ga6vJJy9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Ga6vJJy9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9D7FC4CED0; Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:46:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1734090385; bh=1LJTjOx7kJx7q2mytF+grEPfxYG6mPmq7VZvVuE7Nzg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ga6vJJy9Plt8rk1ZLRU0bSPuEEIFFP2NqMZ14P/0k78uOtrRzmJT9MR3QaA9haWSo gUUXUPwAVnTYsPGiYkA8V6YjKyalKDhOIvkczNBD7KGwWGv5g/x5BbfXbRRSQszI1F geoEG7xNXHypBybJOy49Thqk+6h/zux7VvR6IQLOuw+v1AE04G3zspHzqdrs2SDTka PQ27MD+bupU6M46eKS7qz5ZPI5RCCBdsyqdUqTdUZnpogDyaVmIE+2nAo8J6drEgWr DmbcHUFGaBT9QaDX65+w0C6gw0Cd7jFb1R9C6I83DglShv8SVKS5sf6gh1rm0gSE0Y y9+1nfDq9wnNg== Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:46:22 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: LEROY Christophe Cc: LKML , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] soc/qman: test: Use kthread_run_on_cpu() Message-ID: References: <20241211154035.75565-1-frederic@kernel.org> <20241211154035.75565-7-frederic@kernel.org> <986fee5c-8537-498f-83ec-65a7c7c7a71c@cs-soprasteria.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <986fee5c-8537-498f-83ec-65a7c7c7a71c@cs-soprasteria.com> Le Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 07:27:03AM +0000, LEROY Christophe a écrit : > > > Le 11/12/2024 à 16:40, Frederic Weisbecker a écrit : > > Use the proper API instead of open coding it. > > > > However it looks like kthreads here could be replaced by the use of a > > per-cpu workqueue instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker > > Acked-by: Christophe Leroy Thanks! Feel free to apply this patch to your tree as it's a pretty standalone change.