From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@gmail.com>
Cc: lgoncalv@redhat.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
jonathan.derrick@linux.dev, kw@linux.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org,
manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com,
robh@kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: vmd: Fix spinlock usage on config access for RT kernel
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:36:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2LsFoXotl_SHmNk@kbusch-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241218115951.83062-1-ryotkkr98@gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 08:59:51PM +0900, Ryo Takakura wrote:
> PCI config access is locked with pci_lock which serializes
> pci_user/bus_write_config*() and pci_user/bus_read_config*().
> The subsequently invoked vmd_pci_write() and vmd_pci_read() are also
> serialized as they are only invoked by them respectively.
>
> Remove cfg_lock which is taken by vmd_pci_write() and vmd_pci_read()
> for their serialization as its already serialized by pci_lock.
That's only true if CONFIG_PCI_LOCKLESS_CONFIG isn't set, so pci_lock
won't help with concurrent kernel config access in such a setup. I think
the previous change to raw lock proposal was the correct approach.
> @@ -385,13 +384,11 @@ static int vmd_pci_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
> {
> struct vmd_dev *vmd = vmd_from_bus(bus);
> void __iomem *addr = vmd_cfg_addr(vmd, bus, devfn, reg, len);
> - unsigned long flags;
> int ret = 0;
>
> if (!addr)
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
> switch (len) {
> case 1:
> *value = readb(addr);
There's a comment above this function explaining the need for the lock,
which doesn't make a lot of sense after this patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-18 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-18 11:59 Ryo Takakura
2024-12-18 13:17 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2024-12-18 15:36 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2024-12-18 15:48 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-18 15:57 ` Keith Busch
2024-12-18 16:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2024-12-18 16:35 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2024-12-19 0:53 ` Ryo Takakura
2024-12-19 0:55 ` Ryo Takakura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z2LsFoXotl_SHmNk@kbusch-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jonathan.derrick@linux.dev \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ryotkkr98@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®