On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 08:37:27AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> +Yury and Rasmus
> 
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > The header clearly states that it does not want to be included directly,
> 
> I definitely don't object to the KVM change, but the if y'all expect developers
> to actually honor the "rule", it needs to have teeth.  As evidenced by a similar
> rule in arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h that also gets ignored, an #error that's
> buried under an include guard and triggers on a macro that's never #undef'd is
> quite useless.

To follow up, I am willing to do the proposed change. But before sending
this out, it would be nice if the existing broken includes would be
fixed. So, can this patch be applied first?