From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com (mail-pl1-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E98821CFEA for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 19:27:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734722874; cv=none; b=SbpcxTsLg0JWRGqM/4tifOT2OobixcniS581phKNMieij4+P3TuvKBjxrBFnsOe3yZ/iplE/KuiItuGQ7zLf5B9lCT2eoKygtX2pSRXHw0dD9Q0HQnMDwx42cbZvPBi8pAb7NEbl0a05/i7KFrbjzJQIalZ41H3ZVq2fFCa0ACo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734722874; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6r5rzMO0kN4iH3AsEvrAPJwamMt3khwCzu4EWS8cDWs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lpqXMkh1ZYKKK39G0yW3MBalxl+I6u3U1k9QBsJae8Q+5s3VZWMCb63+jteNXzxTJWR2VUu+Um1PJI/OKnxgvZvHAMm9ESI+ewkCFOm0VnE0EOM2FyaInJ9FI/Iy3pH4ZAwZngoMm8SsBRI14wPDgJvlBKmVcqZl/dHZcR7DUCg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lixom.net; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lixom.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lixom-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lixom-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=2LwSOV2x; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lixom.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lixom.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lixom-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lixom-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="2LwSOV2x" Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-21644e6140cso22508955ad.1 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:27:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lixom-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1734722871; x=1735327671; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=olddjwhjXo1DqV4GopOeuanmM4eDV0mXoyDwwruYnUU=; b=2LwSOV2xIobV6eOcQZaPesU+7LDr7zat0HmWEmXySSUSiaIW+ev5Gxw086EBTFHDTQ pToN9uuka5K/CeQ8yVW9uFJQhGOZgZyjnWvmSwxrRJ7i881E+zWmGYlwUo6pFTYAeDpN XwFccEvbLVpQF0fepZzVnwM3aDl/89uSpqzBjxmm9ykiZXA6ZCvvxkZZzdWrCYp5bJSV vXK/TDoYLFAY2xM3w+LPNjogdi5OLU2/Jm/yWcJT7DtMQL06lCCZb5SUqXL2J07S8tLy ypRdMmia+fchYGWcoVaNVhGAX4vPOkmfuW86+UXhVpiOqZrJTEQEmn28J99YUe3yL7m+ pDCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1734722871; x=1735327671; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=olddjwhjXo1DqV4GopOeuanmM4eDV0mXoyDwwruYnUU=; b=O15JuM2N6It7ZVBWbv4ghXAfUat8SCTasPCgP1dpUuVj39F7Tnlc2spFE9ATIT4uu9 /Op1Q8cNGFQWWQK/9+nHAinHJ+T8ZLxsD//8lYeemVQTzOTIFG2z6qJ/GD+BI+yTfYqd c1QU+A46JjKeGJslC0M6vFqTKlyLj5eAzIexarrkbLqqgGx+dE2YBm+9B3fXmdXWnGC2 PCbcAQf7HnHgxbAgpwJHdOilkGLY2UDZpBuGOZO+cwGpy67xDQmWQ0plo1GELrfp0ovt 7TD6BmJS/K+1X2lIYzXS2nA/bUbGhCT5GkjL1+WwsfHBhd6G2hrsYKAQNGFdmkIHaj88 ChzA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVlF3d2eGsPewVA9PFvNXM7HgctVrZKHhHirFgK5XJL3esqin5IvkBPokyG7ERQiZeaHdYn2j/0+5q1bgQ=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz4gtB7VjdyuNo8Az8/M6pRo7zk40crpfWjZXG3GC30kDrouA+N zK/zLwNjbu2YNw6DEUfaFuKqm+qqyG3YVftMdNOp8w4Gb+wYWLVH5iog0Zwfouc= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu0TU3hMYKWxb8j2H7xclftKVGNWBaMRUrXRsHsAjDRHxdT+8WEvsIAlmxvW/6 G2b29P1RgQOEDeJWAH+A86yWDLZryWi9DBDuZAqEORO318QscI0nccruApO6c1QoN7lMdTUmmhV dhd6sduKwVYiwVyMREEfFaQsslMmbOiW0L1G5VJ9ePnXyuxXOUwSEyc/lm5pgo+IO17hZXxd8eI YSJxdItlj0k3rAVqaif0RzHSt9BZcvdM8DqoOUH9dAkXf4hsTQqToBpDLhIXF59usAYdcCu39SK /tqsHTfzExO/4/jz1JRvYg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE5WE5VjVzI8McvBS1EPUk/D6S0aLKI1p8PJ/8RcVaqoOiUvLB51cQP6j5D7CMD/aylGcndww== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:120e:b0:215:6816:6345 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-219e6ea278cmr54424305ad.16.1734722871527; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:27:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (99-152-116-91.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [99.152.116.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-219dc9cde37sm32680745ad.131.2024.12.20.11.27.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:27:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 11:27:33 -0800 From: Olof Johansson To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Patrice Chotard , Alexandre Torgue , Russell King , Maxime Coquelin , Petr Mladek , Yoann Congal , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, soc@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: config: stm32: Remove useless flags Message-ID: References: <20241220125506.3157268-1-patrice.chotard@foss.st.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 05:47:01PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2024, at 13:55, patrice.chotard@foss.st.com wrote: > > From: Patrice Chotard > > > > Running "make savedefconfig" highlights that some flags are no more used, > > remove them. > > Remove some flags to reduce the kernel image size as STM32 MCU's board > > embeds low amount of RAM. > > > > Changes in V2: > > _ squash patches 2-7 > > _ split patch 1 in three parts and add epxlanations about flags removal. > > Looks good to me, thanks for the update. I assume the plan is to > have this in another pull request rather than me picking up the > patches directly, right? On that note, I would *love* to no longer get patches into my inbox, and I'll start to kindly request the senders of said patches to take me off the recipients in the future. I'm not actively part of the soc maintainer group any more, but I'm guessing that the others would benefit from the same. STM32 already has a maintainer, so there's no need to send these directly to the soc-level maintainers, as far as I can tell. And certainly not in the to: line (vs cc), at that. If there's reason to send them directly, such as the platform maintainer being unavailable or the patch being urgent as a fix, a justification to make sure they're not missed would be useful. -Olof