From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CED151B4247 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2025 19:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.169 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735931729; cv=none; b=dySwejLsrA4/mMkl6RA2eMc3DhVDDbMn2zsnsTBawi0IZ47oSZ5CsXKyfaIp/SpebE5rQjVnUDjOj8c8e3ZgCblgWk1O5oPzJX+Ve+Bp5Z8nAYBN7ocmYFDsZ3Xs7eBVs+ua0t6nc+3f7rsbIGWYsMHLxVD1hjzPFfGOMJbBuYs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735931729; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HHwL+5SpFOMyo+dWaVwTT9ZG/HsdAaRzZjq78yXwUiY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Cs3AEfvQ6I0fiRKNdJFNPIr4Bysd0Uq06b/EIjCXjbsT+NyvTc18pBk8EoqXujI9soxTAFOlsADe5+B5B9Y56Rhe3gt9L6SkVFF9gXLSpJ6wgDkFGtWy4JH7rsJnU/QE4m73JDo+trvOi25yS0pelHc9tB5dvXpfiayMGkqe1y4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=W4LVVFcX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.169 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="W4LVVFcX" Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-21654fdd5daso164427735ad.1 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 11:15:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1735931725; x=1736536525; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ADhotle/1TQemJtHksRH5tzPPxcFcmn+moP8E9RHhKE=; b=W4LVVFcXr5zGTWUWG9ofYYXtxrj3+9d9qQ3YyY1AH7CPDK92tItDxIK5sAV4p1p9h6 y8UGX75k7a+2V2NjaWTkNqFuMbA/uA559G7oQwwZD3aMkU9GylwyWT4qwuE6MCgYA1Tb KtNm9+w7Q3W0gXJd5riQSHB4w+4cvesh9Pfq5xZitmDUh26X3dvuhEvdz5vNrfrI3DU6 6gPsCk2V48Hv+Q5mfWk4hsCCfEDF+aYTbEfySLcIy8xXeHSbZFomg4DmwxRfvDnFbYt3 KUcNOX1QqAhjObwpcH9ZOFnjmZSLmpj/fmACKHG1ue1vS6M0Ep+8Jqfp+LbPMzEQmL// VkXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1735931725; x=1736536525; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ADhotle/1TQemJtHksRH5tzPPxcFcmn+moP8E9RHhKE=; b=CRaecJcWmNJQN+/CbNxUlg2UhfpwdVJb+LBR4R+dqHoB6apKMrimCDcn6ELuop6R/v vHW2anwTEUJ1qojNn5qU36vlX35369lynyWlsBseoGdutgDu6nx9AN+fPPHc3ig420No Sq1ZJIN4dAnz6s9LkW68ESZkgp6VgraS557Mqz4/bW2vxXTJuS8ybdqvIuTLXOIyscDH utRrk84p25Uo1X9Gft6mlyUQ/I+Uwxglc/tLJmZ9cP+BJuDvlYpsBnrrmerweklSUn4I QmUTk/nDpGU6omwYzBIzEY4czaAo+61Vq7DAssdA3ZiolfkeO4pGo7Qul8EN6cW6GTX5 DOXA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXF8EHWs2XAnxRPOD6YspAPABdqrkeWbtgPc8LnlCKSaXMVVcqX0rJpqym93R9T/fJCnTk2yTvdRDay3xw=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyhvx73SHVAS0RA6Beh8JQaiT2snH+m/dW1KOP+0TczDVyLrToT N/5ndmnQVxwE4XaTdY84urmJa8bp/wSOCdFErMxc8Zm8FrJf9JofLCstb5PC8o4= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs/poa1BdUr9N+Kw8O88kH9jH6MWNqvlS8Qs40Gwc3fhF+Xrm6F3de+MtGzj6u DxRBHhURb94s3QHFHN5oTYHm/O7FT+d8FnrGTZl+cDRBeyjRjX88ZZUa1p/4L3BOak7hJaND3et S9cLEBDBkbhG3+l4NT5DasF4gQcB7rzFwinwDiLsDeT//ncRRChRASCY/lYqJut0KccsJLzj4NQ e42etEQ37NZ184Igd1Sc/LnX/X+rNH2mzoalbzoNUnnfrzW4I0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHaGUpdPP/4NVVkV9pM3dpsY14vT8nNjSq+/lATASDlWQ+Up7g3TCX6COowkeiTogzmOyYEVw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:9007:b0:1e0:c954:ea7c with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1e5e049a0b9mr71239375637.27.1735931725624; Fri, 03 Jan 2025 11:15:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ghost ([2600:1010:b0be:4797:42a0:3cad:ff5:6bb5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-72aad8dba99sm26335019b3a.92.2025.01.03.11.15.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Jan 2025 11:15:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 11:15:22 -0800 From: Charlie Jenkins To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Ian Rogers , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools: perf: tests: Fix code reading for riscv Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 01:51:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 05:44:56PM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 05:52:24PM -0800, Charlie Jenkins wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 05:20:15PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > Yeah I agree. This test case did end up being interesting though as it > > > unconvered this change in behavior of objdump on riscv, but that's > > > tangential to the purpose of this test case. We need this patch on riscv > > > to stop this test from failing, but it is also reasonable to approach > > > this differently and not use objdump at all. > > > What's the next step here? Would you prefer to get rid of this test > > entirely? I sent out a v3 that uses uname [1]. > > > Link > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241219-perf_fix_riscv_obj_reading-v3-1-a7d644dcfa50@rivosinc.com/ > > [1] > > I'm ok with this latest version and added it to perf-tools-next, > changing the patch subject line to: > > perf tests code-reading: Handle change in objdump output from binutils >= 2.41 on riscv > > Ok? Yes that is perfect, thank you! - Charlie > > - Arnaldo