From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D775E22CF3F; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 13:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736775968; cv=none; b=rKeiNo7dy/t0AgcSFb9ItsZLh6npTtXto9exSF2MlID+aj9PdH1HB5K2TKY2ZplzbDUl6GiPgF/1wdl6cxOqP+krF1ogD0E3JIvoCAZkY1AwbB0/nCtMAndilDlxt4N4/JiPItJKY6hNmvFgmrqjC3mh3PW/BTBRJK4lj9ihnoQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736775968; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/KjVuxriQplZZvCD+gxuTOaPR/R7Ji24KNy3ypWbQ7E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LBBp1nFRuox5luV68XZxfkMgygL70uPrrNwhVApfsVMakfVIPnHJ8oFCSwFPt34o5KAG1JO0DYN4CqzZIi3I2lJgJZAfq0bHgQzyy7aall2qyLB1qKeNndwlDKVqnN+V2KdvMbDP3UuZkeBzG0wh6R56dQP1BfIInZrIovfsK3w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=dd2QTv/Q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="dd2QTv/Q" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=VvP0e9YArN6B3UfWfkc7Tkwe7mdJjfmpdHvD597Eg9M=; b=dd2QTv/QBH8zyJY4djkIoU8ngd QA5Lf6nzLAj6IGaLDS+3XzNscJEbV5nEZ/UtsRA17h9LSz86jMcYTGn2fiROD070sMCKWruYPwO29 gIDMpw1a30HRKPj9v199AdaA3QARwBGDnFP8X0CwSlRZxDL7NBh9HWGJNiklxNlC0bSMTtgT9Npem l4/x/J71kiXowdNHmojnhcVhkjYVYywueaBVJdd6lY4cHPEDrfeyXTB+wW7F/AXPYSAL7Gd7pBhPq VWnshn4vQVQMkOKO/g/1/QwObg2KsVbU/nDzFMiosjhdegkXpKDN8EBggxyD+na0nQxhIO+irL9OW p6M8EWTA==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tXKlJ-00000000mFp-0dRA; Mon, 13 Jan 2025 13:45:49 +0000 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 13:45:48 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Andi Shyti , Chengming Zhou , Christian Brauner , Christophe Leroy , Dan Carpenter , David Airlie , David Hildenbrand , Hao Ge , Jani Nikula , Johannes Weiner , Joonas Lahtinen , Josef Bacik , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Miklos Szeredi , Nhat Pham , Oscar Salvador , Ran Xiaokai , Rodrigo Vivi , Simona Vetter , Steven Rostedt , Tvrtko Ursulin , Vlastimil Babka , Yosry Ahmed , Yu Zhao , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] mm: Remove PG_reclaim Message-ID: References: <20250113093453.1932083-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250113093453.1932083-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:34:45AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > Use PG_dropbehind instead of PG_reclaim and remove PG_reclaim. I was hoping we'd end up with the name PG_reclaim instead of the name PG_dropbehind. PG_reclaim is a better name for this functionality.