Re: [PATCH] vsprintf: Drop unused assignment of fmt.state

[I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 05:32:32PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:25:07AM +0800, I Hsin Cheng wrote:
> > Remove unused assignment of "fmt.state", in both cases the value of
> > "fmt.state" will be overwritten by either "FORMAT_STATE_PRECISION" or
> > "FORMAT_STATE_NUM", the value "FORMAT_STATE_NONE" isn't going to be used
> > after the assignment.
> 
> ...
> 
> > struct fmt format_decode(struct fmt fmt, struct printf_spec *spec)
> 
> >  			spec->field_width = -spec->field_width;
> >  			spec->flags |= LEFT;
> >  		}
> > -		fmt.state = FORMAT_STATE_NONE;
> > +
> >  		goto precision;
> >  	}
> >  
> 
> While both are kinda redundant, this is not obvious what's stated in the commit
> message. Yes, `goto qualifier;` is straightforward, but not `goto precision;`.
> Which makes me think that these assignments can make code robust against
> potential future changes to allow to catch up the wrong code paths.
> 
> Whatever maintainers decide, technically the change looks correct to me.
> 
> ...
> 
> >  		if (spec->precision < 0)
> >  			spec->precision = 0;
> >  
> > -		fmt.state = FORMAT_STATE_NONE;
> > +
> 
> What's the reason to add an extra blank line? (We have already one here)
> 
> >  		goto qualifier;
> >  	}
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
> 
>

Hi Andy,

Thanks for your kindly review!

> What's the reason to add an extra blank line? (We have already one here)

Well I think I didn't intentionally add a blank line here, I simply
delete the assigment but left the line there. I'll have it deleted as
well if the maintainers decided to make any change.

Best regards,
I Hsin Cheng