From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D88313BAE4; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740574872; cv=none; b=IPjIu7gUXd1agHD61UoUC5a9C97+CYverJkoHlFKub4UbYW/+qjKTgWvDRdsldbdPUZLQPCjYdefCkfc4WKwbP5mqNMzJZb00MxXvpC76nNsOUrGTfgIoIR5gA3BZuuhBYj2JSDiVpRPrecHdSUNyqhrG8nxrA5ENQhO02pSD1M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740574872; c=relaxed/simple; bh=A8QKChVlUKsBmVYbUeoNA+VyGNYEQSe0FDjm2a4c2W4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Fw3P0yx1eYULQtg5Ixt0HH/1Rx3w6ZEroBDZ08uQpZU3uIkpCB9v88cIuq/Jh2NKyxukuY6RxwThBF2CftA1L0U4u2BQ8Kc0RInJpZZFcs7ms6396pHT5urPk4DWhj6ybhUJ4AdL0Vb98i4AzE8Fl/FXRpiypUHPjyNSfnDqBik= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=kXJduQeG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="kXJduQeG" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1740574870; x=1772110870; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=A8QKChVlUKsBmVYbUeoNA+VyGNYEQSe0FDjm2a4c2W4=; b=kXJduQeGez3jrOnQEr6kOfSE/5GVsvd1aBjyUurZiFcjYEi5ltAd/sTB uas54K74+a/sS+2cZJgv/iDiSlPiRvZB1rkLYfYjZ/wT62m1J+Cpk2dge mTDK70zJ/YZ6/rjWQllsC+deI5jT4LsmIRa1vUcf97Ilt1bDtMZDAJSJt Dihquxy1wSv+zs3v3FZ0EcjtyQ//7jOp1cv2KGEPxb0DjqqcfxtqqN3Vo E5kN2LY5drO//81b0E1I5jP96Uc+65K+JDCxc34aNngbxvi4UehS6j9na M5Qc8ykMjSq0mpwhLLGReIoBnu4hHoO1nWCKxL8wpivZqXAUxXZMuo5ak g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: l8IxWQ/pSomJPLB0iXIXuA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: PJAUGhU7Tjy1Mzh4Vkmbpw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11357"; a="52050650" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,317,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="52050650" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2025 05:01:10 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0ZO+v/QpRxWHq/ccWnfWhQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: BfU+kwl/R6esYFOaoReFUA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="121945785" Received: from turnipsi.fi.intel.com (HELO kekkonen.fi.intel.com) ([10.237.72.44]) by orviesa005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2025 05:01:08 -0800 Received: from kekkonen.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kekkonen.fi.intel.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 97F7211F944; Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:01:05 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:01:05 +0000 Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo From: Sakari Ailus To: Dave Stevenson Cc: Richard Leitner , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] media: i2c: ov9282: fix analogue gain maximum Message-ID: References: <20250225-b4-ov9282-gain-v1-0-a24af2820dde@linux.dev> <20250225-b4-ov9282-gain-v1-3-a24af2820dde@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Dave, Richard, On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 12:52:46PM +0000, Dave Stevenson wrote: > > So please feel free to ignore this patch. Should I send a new series > > with just the two minor patches of this series? Or should I include them > > in the next series for the ov9282 driver? > > Up to Sakari. > The other two patches have my R-b responses, so taking those two and > ignoring this one should be fairly simple, but it just depends upon > workflows. I can pick the two first patches of the set now. -- Regards, Sakari Ailus