From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-179.mta1.migadu.com (out-179.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8694E433A8 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2025 05:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.179 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739771305; cv=none; b=gXboN/Zm1b+1RqjWRTbNKKHJWV3yy+5n0Gt6WVsavM3SvJv3ufWA1umG4E0lF72x51R/eQ/lMTOEBwvq+kmlaHxrBsgbxO9RY6cz2P2uCBpHxl2Vaxl0Vlh0tIqc3sFxu61E8uC0mC9wzIRMuhKcWDTTM1E44ZmxzIHlgpwxE4Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739771305; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RJ4isYEhu59iqU1rOZHf5p6XuMqMbEBIsJEzGtMs1KU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=doWHwQYVBD8djx1VAPwN0/sCynLWcSqsoorQNlNwhl0BeMCLeFlE/WG/xB7gI9K6rS54G7BBfsx5z64KqlIGXzrbOclrNOQaWg4yuDuTgcHNmX78OXYJ2K6jT1rn7S8aK5sBp8/BRuLc+1/KPXy9OVRLDLnP+ixOnzBh80DjXB0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=RLvj2yJI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.179 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="RLvj2yJI" Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 21:47:56 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1739771288; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UkW4mVU4PGjrQhcXaepiFW4DCXib/vQm5uJGHZpQDK0=; b=RLvj2yJIbP8AuzXsHnN7NIqWU+zHRRcmjHH29mWGlERK5/PFC5YG9cPSDxHYtoRQPCM/Oq T0L+paz5CHqS1BLeGn467Fg5P0pQS/ev/ucXDazkXJax3lIvYZ9KURvevmOzZDgFN/AGR6 VbudTSZhtowQTx50LCcU8F7n6D/aKKo= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Yosry Ahmed To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Patrick Bellasi , Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini , Josh Poimboeuf , Pawan Gupta , x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Bellasi , Brendan Jackman Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] x86/bugs: KVM: Add support for SRSO_MSR_FIX Message-ID: References: <20250213142815.GBZ64Bf3zPIay9nGza@fat_crate.local> <20250213175057.3108031-1-derkling@google.com> <20250214201005.GBZ6-jHUff99tmkyBK@fat_crate.local> <20250215091527.GAZ7BbL2UfeJ0_52ib@fat_crate.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250215091527.GAZ7BbL2UfeJ0_52ib@fat_crate.local> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 10:15:27AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 12:57:07AM +0000, Yosry Ahmed wrote: > > Should this patch (and the two previously merged patches) be backported > > to stable? I noticed they did not have CC:stable. > > Because a stable backport would require manual backporting, depending on where > it goes. And Brendan, Patrick or I are willing to do that - it's a question of > who gets there first. :-) Thanks for the context, didn't realize a manual backport was needed.