mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	rangemachine@gmail.com, whanos@sergal.fun
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: SVM: Fix DEBUGCTL bugs
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 06:04:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8HCXP0hFYs0dUxM@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <653c3c6e-bdfc-4604-bda0-3b67970a0c62@amd.com>

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> On 28-Feb-25 3:54 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Fix a long-lurking bug in SVM where KVM runs the guest with the host's
> > DEBUGCTL if LBR virtualization is disabled.  AMD CPUs rather stupidly
> > context switch DEBUGCTL if and only if LBR virtualization is enabled (not
> > just supported, but fully enabled).
> > 
> > The bug has gone unnoticed because until recently, the only bits that
> > KVM would leave set were things like BTF, which are guest visible but
> > won't cause functional problems unless guest software is being especially
> > particular about #DBs.
> > 
> > The bug was exposed by the addition of BusLockTrap ("Detect" in the kernel),
> > as the resulting #DBs due to split-lock accesses in guest userspace (lol
> > Steam) get reflected into the guest by KVM.
> > 
> > Note, I don't love suppressing DEBUGCTL.BTF, but practically speaking that's
> > likely the behavior that SVM guests have gotten the vast, vast majority of
> > the time, and given that it's the behavior on Intel, it's (hopefully) a safe
> > option for a fix, e.g. versus trying to add proper BTF virtualization on the
> > fly.
> > 
> > v3:
> >  - Suppress BTF, as KVM doesn't actually support it. [Ravi]
> >  - Actually load the guest's DEBUGCTL (though amusingly, with BTF squashed,
> >    it's guaranteed to be '0' in this scenario). [Ravi]
> > 
> > v2:
> >  - Load the guest's DEBUGCTL instead of simply zeroing it on VMRUN.
> >  - Drop bits 5:3 from guest DEBUGCTL so that KVM doesn't let the guest
> >    unintentionally enable BusLockTrap (AMD repurposed bits). [Ravi]
> >  - Collect a review. [Xiaoyao]
> >  - Make bits 5:3 fully reserved, in a separate not-for-stable patch.
> > 
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250224181315.2376869-1-seanjc@google.com
> 
> For the series,
> 
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>

Thank you for all your help, much appreciated!

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-28 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-27 22:24 Sean Christopherson
2025-02-27 22:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: SVM: Drop DEBUGCTL[5:2] from guest's effective value Sean Christopherson
2025-02-27 22:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: SVM: Suppress DEBUGCTL.BTF on AMD Sean Christopherson
2025-02-27 22:24 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: x86: Snapshot the host's DEBUGCTL in common x86 Sean Christopherson
2025-02-27 22:24 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: SVM: Manually context switch DEBUGCTL if LBR virtualization is disabled Sean Christopherson
2025-02-27 22:24 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: x86: Snapshot the host's DEBUGCTL after disabling IRQs Sean Christopherson
2025-02-27 22:24 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: SVM: Treat DEBUGCTL[5:2] as reserved Sean Christopherson
2025-02-28  9:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] KVM: SVM: Fix DEBUGCTL bugs Ravi Bangoria
2025-02-28 14:04   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-02-28 23:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-02  3:57 ` Maxim Levitsky
2025-04-08 15:08   ` Maxim Levitsky
2025-04-08 22:43   ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-09 20:52     ` Maxim Levitsky
2025-04-14  6:32     ` Sandipan Das
2025-04-14 14:43       ` Maxim Levitsky
2025-05-02 21:51 ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8HCXP0hFYs0dUxM@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rangemachine@gmail.com \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=whanos@sergal.fun \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®