From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: mike.leach@linaro.org, james.clark@linaro.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
clrkwllms@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] coresight-tmc: change tmc_drvdata spinlock's type to raw_spinlock_t
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 10:35:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8l6W8KtWkA5kS0s@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7a142ee-d34f-494a-b4f9-921d739aeb59@arm.com>
Hi, Suzuki
> Unfortunately, this still doesn't cover the current coresight next branch. I
> get build errors as below :
>
> "[PATCH] coresight-tmc: change tmc_drvdata spinlock's type to" has style
> problems, please review. This is because, we merged the coresight panic
> trace support in the coresight next, on 21st Feb.
>
>
> NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
> them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> CC [M] drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.o
> CC [M] drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.o
> CC [M] drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.o
> CC [M] drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-catu.o
> In file included from ./include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
> from ./include/linux/gfp.h:7,
> from ./include/linux/slab.h:16,
> from ./include/linux/resource_ext.h:11,
> from ./include/linux/acpi.h:13,
> from drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c:7:
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c: In function
> ‘tmc_crashdata_open’:
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c:361:20: error: passing
> argument 1 of ‘spinlock_check’ from incompatible pointer type
> [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> 361 | spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | raw_spinlock_t * {aka struct raw_spinlock *}
> ./include/linux/spinlock.h:244:34: note: in definition of macro
> ‘raw_spin_lock_irqsave’
> 244 | flags = _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock); \
> | ^~~~
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c:361:2: note: in expansion
> of macro ‘spin_lock_irqsave’
> 361 | spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from ./include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
> from ./include/linux/gfp.h:7,
> from ./include/linux/slab.h:16,
> from ./include/linux/resource_ext.h:11,
> from ./include/linux/acpi.h:13,
> from drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c:7:
> ./include/linux/spinlock.h:324:67: note: expected ‘spinlock_t *’ {aka
> ‘struct spinlock *’} but argument is of type ‘raw_spinlock_t *’ {aka ‘struct
> raw_spinlock *’}
> 324 | static __always_inline raw_spinlock_t *spinlock_check(spinlock_t
> *lock)
Sorry! I'll rework again for this. thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-06 9:47 [PATCH v5 0/9] coresight: change some driver' spinlock " Yeoreum Yun
2025-03-06 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] coresight: change coresight_device lock " Yeoreum Yun
2025-03-06 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] coresight-etm4x: change etmv4_drvdata spinlock " Yeoreum Yun
2025-03-06 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] coresight: change coresight_trace_id_map's lock " Yeoreum Yun
2025-03-06 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] coresight-cti: change cti_drvdata spinlock's " Yeoreum Yun
2025-03-06 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] coresight-etb10: change etb_drvdata " Yeoreum Yun
2025-03-06 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] coresight-funnel: change funnel_drvdata " Yeoreum Yun
2025-03-06 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] coresight-replicator: change replicator_drvdata " Yeoreum Yun
2025-03-06 9:47 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] coresight-tmc: change tmc_drvdata " Yeoreum Yun
2025-03-06 10:25 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-03-06 10:35 ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2025-03-06 9:48 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] coresight/ultrasoc: change smb_drv_data " Yeoreum Yun
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-25 13:52 [PATCH v5 0/9] coresight: change some driver' spinlock " Yeoreum Yun
2025-02-25 13:52 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] coresight-tmc: change tmc_drvdata spinlock's " Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8l6W8KtWkA5kS0s@e129823.arm.com \
--to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®