From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6D961F94C for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 22:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741385768; cv=none; b=OYWhcbRcFsn5/R4fZv1baSvZ70gokXw5HsnFPbaRZ7g8uqaaUxrHHvDQvRaoEg04j8QlC8DTpH8lKkOkSEOBo2ryPjChrz0XbzuBJJmT4nTEq/6SOc5pmb90jhVkiCGoKSeBkbFwreI6hyEHF/CC+9xXkBHclAY2N/HUev0r8Ds= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741385768; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tfjO0wLc/sY0wUsPLXOAszI/hnr/k/6TVIxNQkkddp4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VukeMl6bgCN7SSysv8b9U1onoGBTqJgAlM5t8W5FSJn+dNGX14FH2tNjQk7WKkJ0ktDV149fPrUzvjjOZSPmPlipKF2Udtbf4DPrQ9yBXbgdP/vRj9rE3n8D5qp1tRhhHYhg/oquI/BsB7rAToDFbccZxLCFPWE7eWua8YzCLBs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jT71TCLQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jT71TCLQ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19F0AC4CED1; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 22:16:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741385767; bh=tfjO0wLc/sY0wUsPLXOAszI/hnr/k/6TVIxNQkkddp4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jT71TCLQ/ofLsANiDQ7d/9BaltnW6/9ecifsnZxLsLB+CybQfdyL2Wr8VJ7kzuq8k 9/DMf7rhDIe0iifdgBN7TU+L737oPhXItvSG+rl/VdUVho7jxS4kR8+1pRJyYa14XY zw47HM2nQ2qfLOYUnSiB2qERf6yx3C3mlNI1Z0DEY5DskGjKBGPba1d82/ks6LLjmz ijhDiTQv+WO1cGGwBEcbft55jo+EUKx2aet9DyJxqz/axuWWIPeTthxP4kyM9MfRkt SVF9RAROBxgRpS7tKuqvg1zsK+LWXruXSrdwGbgba9sm3VF46yTqpoUMGnMHy6qAcn G4DUIpYmVybNA== Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 23:16:04 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Anna-Maria Behnsen , Benjamin Segall , Eric Dumazet , Andrey Vagin , Pavel Tikhomirov , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [patch V2 07/17] posix-timers: Simplify lock/unlock_timer() Message-ID: References: <20250302185753.311903554@linutronix.de> <20250302193627.354754536@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250302193627.354754536@linutronix.de> Le Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 08:36:54PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit : > Since the integration of sigqueue into the timer struct, lock_timer() is > only used in task context. So taking the lock with irqsave() is not longer > required. > > Convert it to use spin_[un]lock_irq(). > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker