From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
fsverity@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fsverity: Remove WQ_UNBOUND from fsverity read workqueue
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 15:59:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZA+qt0gakiyAoacr@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230310193325.620493-1-nhuck@google.com>
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 11:33:25AM -0800, Nathan Huckleberry wrote:
> WQ_UNBOUND causes significant scheduler latency on ARM64/Android. This
> is problematic for latency sensitive workloads, like I/O
> post-processing.
>
> Removing WQ_UNBOUND gives a 96% reduction in fsverity workqueue related
> scheduler latency and improves app cold startup times by ~30ms.
> WQ_UNBOUND was also removed from the dm-verity workqueue for the same
> reason [1].
>
> This code was tested by running Android app startup benchmarks and
> measuring how long the fsverity workqueue spent in the runnable state.
>
> Before
> Total workqueue scheduler latency: 553800us
> After
> Total workqueue scheduler latency: 18962us
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230202012348.885402-1-nhuck@google.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v1 -> v2:
> - Added comment about WQ_UNBOUND
> - Added info about related dm-verity patches in commit message
>
> fs/verity/verify.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/verity/verify.c b/fs/verity/verify.c
> index f50e3b5b52c9..782b8b4a24c1 100644
> --- a/fs/verity/verify.c
> +++ b/fs/verity/verify.c
> @@ -387,15 +387,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fsverity_enqueue_verify_work);
> int __init fsverity_init_workqueue(void)
> {
> /*
> - * Use an unbound workqueue to allow bios to be verified in parallel
> - * even when they happen to complete on the same CPU. This sacrifices
> - * locality, but it's worthwhile since hashing is CPU-intensive.
> - *
> * Also use a high-priority workqueue to prioritize verification work,
> * which blocks reads from completing, over regular application tasks.
> + *
> + * This workqueue is not marked as unbound for performance reasons.
> + * Using an unbound workqueue for crypto operations causes excessive
> + * scheduler latency on ARM64.
> */
> fsverity_read_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("fsverity_read_queue",
> - WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_HIGHPRI,
> + WQ_HIGHPRI,
> num_online_cpus());
Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fsverity/linux.git/log/?h=for-next
I adjusted the comment slightly so that the first paragraph doesn't start with
"Also".
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-13 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-10 19:33 Nathan Huckleberry
2023-03-13 22:59 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2023-03-13 23:07 ` Nathan Huckleberry
2023-03-14 23:20 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZA+qt0gakiyAoacr@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhuck@google.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®