From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Jose E . Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tracepoint: Fix CFI failures with tp_sub_func (v2)
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 10:04:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZB11vw+U39WMA+Cr@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230323212832.5691-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 05:28:32PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> When CLANG_CFI is in use, using tracing will occasionally result in
> CFI failures, e.g.
> Avoid this by comparing the tracepoint function pointer to the value 1
> before calling each function.
> Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Thanks for this!
This looks good to me, and in testing it solves the CFI failure, so FWIW:
Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutlnand@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Thanks,
Mark.
> ---
> include/linux/tracepoint.h | 14 ++++++++++++--
> kernel/tracepoint.c | 20 +++++++-------------
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> index 4b33b95eb8be..0aeac249d412 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ struct trace_eval_map {
>
> #define TRACEPOINT_DEFAULT_PRIO 10
>
> +/* Reserved value for tracepoint callback. */
> +#define TRACEPOINT_FUNC_SKIP ((void *) 0x1)
> +
> extern struct srcu_struct tracepoint_srcu;
>
> extern int
> @@ -314,11 +317,18 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
> it_func_ptr = \
> rcu_dereference_raw((&__tracepoint_##_name)->funcs); \
> if (it_func_ptr) { \
> - do { \
> + for (;;) { \
> it_func = READ_ONCE((it_func_ptr)->func); \
> + if ((uintptr_t) it_func <= (uintptr_t) TRACEPOINT_FUNC_SKIP) { \
> + if (it_func == TRACEPOINT_FUNC_SKIP) \
> + continue; \
> + else \
> + break; \
> + } \
> __data = (it_func_ptr)->data; \
> ((void(*)(void *, proto))(it_func))(__data, args); \
> - } while ((++it_func_ptr)->func); \
> + it_func_ptr++; \
> + } \
> } \
> return 0; \
> } \
> diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
> index f23144af5743..2fa108ddbbc2 100644
> --- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
> +++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
> @@ -98,12 +98,6 @@ struct tp_probes {
> struct tracepoint_func probes[];
> };
>
> -/* Called in removal of a func but failed to allocate a new tp_funcs */
> -static void tp_stub_func(void)
> -{
> - return;
> -}
> -
> static inline void *allocate_probes(int count)
> {
> struct tp_probes *p = kmalloc(struct_size(p, probes, count),
> @@ -193,8 +187,8 @@ func_add(struct tracepoint_func **funcs, struct tracepoint_func *tp_func,
> if (old) {
> /* (N -> N+1), (N != 0, 1) probes */
> for (iter_probes = 0; old[iter_probes].func; iter_probes++) {
> - if (old[iter_probes].func == tp_stub_func)
> - continue; /* Skip stub functions. */
> + if (old[iter_probes].func == TRACEPOINT_FUNC_SKIP)
> + continue;
> if (old[iter_probes].func == tp_func->func &&
> old[iter_probes].data == tp_func->data)
> return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
> @@ -208,7 +202,7 @@ func_add(struct tracepoint_func **funcs, struct tracepoint_func *tp_func,
> if (old) {
> nr_probes = 0;
> for (iter_probes = 0; old[iter_probes].func; iter_probes++) {
> - if (old[iter_probes].func == tp_stub_func)
> + if (old[iter_probes].func == TRACEPOINT_FUNC_SKIP)
> continue;
> /* Insert before probes of lower priority */
> if (pos < 0 && old[iter_probes].prio < prio)
> @@ -246,7 +240,7 @@ static void *func_remove(struct tracepoint_func **funcs,
> for (nr_probes = 0; old[nr_probes].func; nr_probes++) {
> if ((old[nr_probes].func == tp_func->func &&
> old[nr_probes].data == tp_func->data) ||
> - old[nr_probes].func == tp_stub_func)
> + old[nr_probes].func == TRACEPOINT_FUNC_SKIP)
> nr_del++;
> }
> }
> @@ -269,7 +263,7 @@ static void *func_remove(struct tracepoint_func **funcs,
> for (i = 0; old[i].func; i++) {
> if ((old[i].func != tp_func->func ||
> old[i].data != tp_func->data) &&
> - old[i].func != tp_stub_func)
> + old[i].func != TRACEPOINT_FUNC_SKIP)
> new[j++] = old[i];
> }
> new[nr_probes - nr_del].func = NULL;
> @@ -277,12 +271,12 @@ static void *func_remove(struct tracepoint_func **funcs,
> } else {
> /*
> * Failed to allocate, replace the old function
> - * with calls to tp_stub_func.
> + * with TRACEPOINT_FUNC_SKIP.
> */
> for (i = 0; old[i].func; i++) {
> if (old[i].func == tp_func->func &&
> old[i].data == tp_func->data)
> - WRITE_ONCE(old[i].func, tp_stub_func);
> + WRITE_ONCE(old[i].func, TRACEPOINT_FUNC_SKIP);
> }
> *funcs = old;
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-24 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-23 21:28 Mathieu Desnoyers
2023-03-24 10:04 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZB11vw+U39WMA+Cr@FVFF77S0Q05N \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®