mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
To: linux@steffen.cc
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Steffen Dirkwinkel <s.dirkwinkel@beckhoff.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.10-rt] kernel: fork: set wake_q_sleeper.next=NULL again in dup_task_struct
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:10:04 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBg+3pGG9v+hQFYI@uudg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230320080347.32434-1-linux@steffen.cc>

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 09:03:47AM +0100, linux@steffen.cc wrote:
> From: Steffen Dirkwinkel <s.dirkwinkel@beckhoff.com>
> 
> Without this we get system hangs within a couple of days.
> It's also reproducible in minutes with "stress-ng --exec 20".
> 
> Example error in dmesg:
> INFO: task stress-ng:163916 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>       Not tainted 5.10.168-rt83 #2
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> task:stress-ng       state:D stack:    0 pid:163916 ppid: 72833 flags:0x00004000
> Call Trace:
>  __schedule+0x2bd/0x940
>  preempt_schedule_lock+0x23/0x50
>  rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked+0x117/0x2c0
>  rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x51/0x80
>  rt_write_lock+0x1e/0x1c0
>  do_exit+0x3ac/0xb20
>  do_group_exit+0x39/0xb0
>  get_signal+0x145/0x960
>  ? wake_up_new_task+0x21f/0x3c0
>  arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xf1/0x830
>  ? __x64_sys_futex+0x146/0x1d0
>  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x116/0x1a0
>  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x28/0x190
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
> RIP: 0033:0x7f738d9074a7
> RSP: 002b:00007ffdafda3cb0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca
> RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 00000000000000ca RCX: 00007f738d9074a7
> RDX: 0000000000028051 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00007f738be949d0
> RBP: 00007ffdafda3d88 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007f738be94700
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000028051
> R13: 00007f738be949d0 R14: 00007ffdafda51e0 R15: 00007f738be94700
> 
> Fixes: 1ba44dcf789d ("Merge tag 'v5.10.162' into v5.10-rt")

Thank you for spotting and investigating that!

I dropped that specific line while fixing a small merge conflict from

    788d0824269b io_uring: import 5.15-stable io_uring

Interestingly enough, I didn't see that problem while running stress-ng.
I may need to add a few more, different, systems to my test base.

Anyway, I will add this fix to the next build.

Luis


> Signed-off-by: Steffen Dirkwinkel <s.dirkwinkel@beckhoff.com>
> ---
>  kernel/fork.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index c6e0d555fca9..0c4c20eb762c 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -949,6 +949,7 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig, int node)
>  	tsk->splice_pipe = NULL;
>  	tsk->task_frag.page = NULL;
>  	tsk->wake_q.next = NULL;
> +	tsk->wake_q_sleeper.next = NULL;
>  	tsk->pf_io_worker = NULL;
>  
>  	account_kernel_stack(tsk, 1);
> -- 
> 2.40.0
> 
---end quoted text---


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-20 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-20  8:03 linux
2023-03-20 11:10 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves [this message]
2023-03-23  8:59   ` Leonard, Niall
2023-03-23 10:55     ` Leonard, Niall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZBg+3pGG9v+hQFYI@uudg.org \
    --to=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@steffen.cc \
    --cc=s.dirkwinkel@beckhoff.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®