From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3160DC7619A for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 09:44:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231124AbjCVJog (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2023 05:44:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50706 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229662AbjCVJoe (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2023 05:44:34 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7722E2DE5F for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 02:44:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1679478273; x=1711014273; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=JXgG6zxXcorUDglIbt1WLKGkdx5y8z2vjqrNmNha7MI=; b=NWrEIPPywoW6rCgCNvIz0c4IleOBbv/ev8jHKJ/weEHth5zAyXYDd4Q2 f6R/Lay7VAUz73rtjakO6YEu1JliVk2ZuUuLFOhONfsSVKQpsF5trtIXl +Lq2KlMMcNEIfvzCrVZzii8Xhctuwa/Qu3+l+AEWATIbMXqGsBxveBe69 y11Gd3ZfV8zwSmHmWafQiWtrdZDWp81VrHxXNJtBx/U8vwXKNwUdaCkwo 1HuNg9YrRq3Db0Yn2PyusUhaPmSfTqpY09/7LGX2qNsL20Nr8OAGHGT61 yqbb92/cmTH/hi/1Mzk14+IcyOxiAqTyF06v7dG05qmwvqu1r40l4zizs w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10656"; a="327550535" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,281,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="327550535" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2023 02:44:33 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10656"; a="825321904" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,281,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="825321904" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2023 02:44:29 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pev18-0075Gt-17; Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:44:26 +0200 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:44:26 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Vaittinen, Matti" Cc: Stephen Boyd , Matti Vaittinen , Maxime Ripard , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Maarten Lankhorst , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Emma Anholt , Heikki Krogerus , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ma=EDra?= Canal , Javier Martinez Canillas , Noralf =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tr=F8nnes?= , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] kunit: drm/tests: move generic helpers Message-ID: References: <1abd47784b08939ff08ff03d3d4f60449e87625f.1679062529.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com> <20230317150916.a3xrh25ywe5k77yp@houat> <5ace543cae7a54db399750a1b330c3ae.sboyd@kernel.org> <3479e3d4e5e1d84243ca35398ab392ef.sboyd@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 06:16:27AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote: > On 3/21/23 20:59, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2023-03-20 22:45:52) > >> On 3/20/23 21:23, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>> Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2023-03-18 23:36:20) > >> Besides, I was not sure if you were planning to add similar helper or > >> just wrappers to individual functions. Wanted to ping you just in case > >> this has some impact to what you do. > > > > I don't have a need to bind a device to a driver to satisfy devm APIs > > currently. I could probably use it though to test some devm code in the > > clk APIs. The only impact is that we're modifying the same files. > > Thanks for clarifying this. > > >>> Have you Cced kunit folks and the > >>> list on the kunit patches? They may have some opinion. > >> > >> This patch was should have contained the > >> include/kunit/platform_device.h. That file was pulling the Kunit people > >> in recipients but I messed up things with last minute changes so both > >> the header and people were dropped. I'll fix this for v5. > > > > Ok, I'll be on the lookout for v5. From what I can tell kunit goes > > through the kernel selftest tree and there isn't a kunit git tree as > > such. > > Right. I am not sure what will be the best tree to carry the testability > changes. It seems that all of the IIO-tests in v5 will depend on the > kunit stuff, and I think I will also include the DRM test fixes in this > series as well just to keep things sorted in my mailbox. Anyways, I hope > to finish the changes for v5 soon(ish) - maybe already Today and in any > case during this week. I'll be CC:ing you and Brendan with (relevant > patches of) v5 as well. Thank you, folks, for doing this. Let's make Linux kernel greater (than it is already is). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko