From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FE7C6FD18 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2023 12:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232129AbjDRMuP (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2023 08:50:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42062 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232125AbjDRMuL (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2023 08:50:11 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1E9167FE for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2023 05:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 33ICnaN3014619; Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:49:36 +0200 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:49:36 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Jingbo Xu , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/alternatives: fix build issue with binutils before 2.28 Message-ID: References: <20230418064228.21577-1-w@1wt.eu> <20230418100212.GBZD5qpFuxKaz3WtAC@fat_crate.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230418100212.GBZD5qpFuxKaz3WtAC@fat_crate.local> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 12:02:12PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:42:28AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Boris, I understood from your message that 2.28 was the first working version, > > so that's what I mentioned here. My tests showed that 2.27 wasn't sufficient > > and that 2.29 was OK. > > No, you have it right above: > > U suffix - 2.27 > L/LL suffixes - 2.28 > > I was wondering where to put that info for future reference but didn't > find a good place so I extended your commit message with it. Now at > least we have left bread crumbs in case we need it in the future. I wondered the same which is why I left it in the comment as a warning for future wanderers. Thanks! Willy