From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>,
longman@redhat.com, swboyd@chromium.org, linux@roeck-us.net,
wuchi.zero@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+5093ba19745994288b53@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
danieller@nvidia.com, petrm@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugobject: Prevent init race with static objects
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 16:40:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZE/BQ5yUQZUwhlTu@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zg7dzgao.ffs@tglx>
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 09:54:39AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Statically initialized objects are usually not initialized via the init()
> function of the subsystem. They are special cased and the subsystem
> provides a function to validate whether an object which is not yet tracked
> by debugobjects is statically initialized. This means the object is started
> to be tracked on first use, e.g. activation.
>
> This works perfectly fine, unless there are two concurrent operations on
> that object. Schspa decoded the problem:
[...]
> This race exists forever, but was never observed until mod_timer() got a
> debug_object_assert_init() added which is outside of the timer base lock
> held section right at the beginning of the function to cover the lockless
> early exit points too.
>
> Rework the code so that the lookup, the static object check and the
> tracking object association happens atomically under the hash bucket
> lock. This prevents the issue completely as all callers are serialized on
> the hash bucket lock and therefore cannot observe inconsistent state.
>
> Fixes: 3ac7fe5a4aab ("infrastructure to debug (dynamic) objects")
> Reported-by: syzbot+5093ba19745994288b53@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Debugged-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=22c8a5938eab640d1c6bcc0e3dc7be519d878462
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230303161906.831686-1-schspa@gmail.com
Thomas,
With this patch we see the following warning in the kernel log during
boot:
"ODEBUG: Out of memory. ODEBUG disabled"
In which case, the stats are:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/debug_objects/stats
max_chain :24
max_checked :37
warnings :0
fixups :0
pool_free :4297
pool_pcp_free :84
pool_min_free :0
pool_used :0
pool_max_used :6615
on_free_list :0
objs_allocated:15616
objs_freed :11319
If I revert this patch, the warning disappears and I see the following
stats:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/debug_objects/stats
max_chain :25
max_checked :40
warnings :0
fixups :0
pool_free :1219
pool_pcp_free :209
pool_min_free :289
pool_used :1578
pool_max_used :8026
on_free_list :0
objs_allocated:32304
objs_freed :29507
The following diff seems to solve the problem for me:
diff --git a/lib/debugobjects.c b/lib/debugobjects.c
index b796799fadb2..af4bd66c571c 100644
--- a/lib/debugobjects.c
+++ b/lib/debugobjects.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#define ODEBUG_HASH_BITS 14
#define ODEBUG_HASH_SIZE (1 << ODEBUG_HASH_BITS)
-#define ODEBUG_POOL_SIZE 1024
+#define ODEBUG_POOL_SIZE (16 * 1024)
#define ODEBUG_POOL_MIN_LEVEL 256
#define ODEBUG_POOL_PERCPU_SIZE 64
#define ODEBUG_BATCH_SIZE 16
In which case, the stats are:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/debug_objects/stats
max_chain :28
max_checked :64
warnings :0
fixups :0
pool_free :14789
pool_pcp_free :192
pool_min_free :8120
pool_used :1595
pool_max_used :8264
on_free_list :0
objs_allocated:16384
objs_freed :0
I'm not familiar with the debugobjects code, but maybe it makes sense to
make "ODEBUG_POOL_SIZE" configurable via Kconfig in a similar fashion to
"CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_MEM_POOL_SIZE"?
Please let me know if more information is required or if you want me to
test a patch.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-01 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-03 16:19 [PATCH 1/2] debugobject: fix concurrency issues with is_static_object Schspa Shi
2023-03-03 16:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] debugobject: add unit test for static debug object Schspa Shi
2023-03-23 3:16 ` Schspa Shi
2023-03-23 7:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-23 8:44 ` Schspa Shi
2023-04-13 22:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-03 17:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] debugobject: fix concurrency issues with is_static_object Waiman Long
2023-03-03 17:53 ` Schspa Shi
2023-03-04 0:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-03 23:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-22 15:40 ` Schspa Shi
2023-03-22 17:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-22 17:55 ` Schspa Shi
2023-03-22 21:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-23 3:10 ` Schspa Shi
2023-03-22 18:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-22 18:18 ` Schspa Shi
2023-04-12 7:54 ` [PATCH] debugobject: Prevent init race with static objects Thomas Gleixner
2023-04-13 0:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2023-04-13 12:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-01 13:40 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2023-05-01 15:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-05-02 5:53 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-05-02 8:12 ` [tip: core/debugobjects] debugobject: Ensure pool refill (again) tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2023-04-15 21:20 ` [tip: core/debugobjects] debugobject: Prevent init race with static objects tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZE/BQ5yUQZUwhlTu@shredder \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=danieller@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=schspa@gmail.com \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=syzbot+5093ba19745994288b53@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wuchi.zero@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®