From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, tj@kernel.org,
dennis@kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
yangerkun@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] writeback, cgroup: fix null-ptr-deref write in bdi_split_work_to_wbs
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 15:01:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFLZw33qCKIYSDMJ@P9FQF9L96D.corp.robot.car> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230502171701.58465d422e94cf038178dc51@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 05:17:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 21:08:26 +0800 Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> > KASAN report null-ptr-deref:
> > ==================================================================
> > BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in bdi_split_work_to_wbs+0x5c5/0x7b0
> > Write of size 8 at addr 0000000000000000 by task sync/943
> > CPU: 5 PID: 943 Comm: sync Tainted: 6.3.0-rc5-next-20230406-dirty #461
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > dump_stack_lvl+0x7f/0xc0
> > print_report+0x2ba/0x340
> > kasan_report+0xc4/0x120
> > kasan_check_range+0x1b7/0x2e0
> > __kasan_check_write+0x24/0x40
> > bdi_split_work_to_wbs+0x5c5/0x7b0
> > sync_inodes_sb+0x195/0x630
> > sync_inodes_one_sb+0x3a/0x50
> > iterate_supers+0x106/0x1b0
> > ksys_sync+0x98/0x160
> > [...]
> > ==================================================================
> >
> > The race that causes the above issue is as follows:
> >
> > cpu1 cpu2
> > -------------------------|-------------------------
> > inode_switch_wbs
> > INIT_WORK(&isw->work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn)
> > queue_rcu_work(isw_wq, &isw->work)
> > // queue_work async
> > inode_switch_wbs_work_fn
> > wb_put_many(old_wb, nr_switched)
> > percpu_ref_put_many
> > ref->data->release(ref)
> > cgwb_release
> > queue_work(cgwb_release_wq, &wb->release_work)
> > // queue_work async
> > &wb->release_work
> > cgwb_release_workfn
> > ksys_sync
> > iterate_supers
> > sync_inodes_one_sb
> > sync_inodes_sb
> > bdi_split_work_to_wbs
> > kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC)
> > // alloc memory failed
> > percpu_ref_exit
> > ref->data = NULL
> > kfree(data)
> > wb_get(wb)
> > percpu_ref_get(&wb->refcnt)
> > percpu_ref_get_many(ref, 1)
> > atomic_long_add(nr, &ref->data->count)
> > atomic64_add(i, v)
> > // trigger null-ptr-deref
> >
> > bdi_split_work_to_wbs() traverses &bdi->wb_list to split work into all wbs.
> > If the allocation of new work fails, the on-stack fallback will be used and
> > the reference count of the current wb is increased afterwards. If cgroup
> > writeback membership switches occur before getting the reference count and
> > the current wb is released as old_wd, then calling wb_get() or wb_put()
> > will trigger the null pointer dereference above.
> >
> > This issue was introduced in v4.3-rc7 (see fix tag1). Both sync_inodes_sb()
> > and __writeback_inodes_sb_nr() calls to bdi_split_work_to_wbs() can trigger
> > this issue. For scenarios called via sync_inodes_sb(), originally commit
> > 7fc5854f8c6e ("writeback: synchronize sync(2) against cgroup writeback
> > membership switches") reduced the possibility of the issue by adding
> > wb_switch_rwsem, but in v5.14-rc1 (see fix tag2) removed the
> > "inode_io_list_del_locked(inode, old_wb)" from inode_switch_wbs_work_fn()
> > so that wb->state contains WB_has_dirty_io, thus old_wb is not skipped
> > when traversing wbs in bdi_split_work_to_wbs(), and the issue becomes
> > easily reproducible again.
> >
> > To solve this problem, percpu_ref_exit() is called under RCU protection
> > to avoid race between cgwb_release_workfn() and bdi_split_work_to_wbs().
> > Moreover, replace wb_get() with wb_tryget() in bdi_split_work_to_wbs(),
> > and skip the current wb if wb_tryget() fails because the wb has already
> > been shutdown.
> >
> > Fixes: b817525a4a80 ("writeback: bdi_writeback iteration must not skip dying ones")
> > Fixes: f3b6a6df38aa ("writeback, cgroup: keep list of inodes attached to bdi_writeback")
>
> Cc Roman for this second commit.
Thanks for the heads up!
The patch looks good to me.
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-03 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-10 13:08 Baokun Li
2023-04-11 3:53 ` Andrew Morton
2023-04-11 4:09 ` Baokun Li
2023-04-11 10:08 ` Jan Kara
2023-04-12 17:00 ` Tejun Heo
2023-05-03 0:17 ` Andrew Morton
2023-05-03 22:01 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2023-05-04 2:29 ` Baokun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZFLZw33qCKIYSDMJ@P9FQF9L96D.corp.robot.car \
--to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®