From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A3BC77B7F for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 09:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232054AbjEPJTF (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2023 05:19:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57030 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231994AbjEPJSb (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 May 2023 05:18:31 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C64165264; Tue, 16 May 2023 02:18:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3090d3e9c92so3221081f8f.2; Tue, 16 May 2023 02:18:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1684228682; x=1686820682; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7C9HShPKwn8h1fUg0l7Pz8YXH+XNLX9Yv4wxCqkHcAc=; b=Png6P3fgMfxfssVCej+KqOaJ1EANCqSziEoKlHUZpz7WG3OiRvQSJrn2iOW2Pao/Vw vKypo5Ybk/aTbUN23TEfT7qSpVchi0McYwxu6cIirZSkxb7BE4h6cNriHaOy/nhc33Xr 559/6kQMGduAkgnhOOncbg9WlK1evK675Qjt9IqWbtDh/Ew4VgFvnO+E5+1YU56gk8oq RuM4raoxPhm9+OtjTnR6SxZFpBjBFL415k5JJz6Mk9pfS25ylXk1M7ePH/eolVtYz3g7 pMfMlWBl0poA60rbrHKaXkRlJR0nS4wadQ1n4zWA/xA63iapr0diNaLrjisEARvYaUjS 0d8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684228682; x=1686820682; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=7C9HShPKwn8h1fUg0l7Pz8YXH+XNLX9Yv4wxCqkHcAc=; b=jNBqX9tEFOJlgpDD6A7yzU6EQIae4+651wXA1YGP4M0zALil2EpZZeMymDa3QlxyS/ ftg3oJHqEr6ln4LIzyWfTBftxW5/ZBNBqvyehA00gsPMYhRC+kR3rz4WGLnKVInTscr3 DcHQLdyNMhRADDN/kGdPzxnMcR2cT3ZOGDRtSRxCoQVcTRYZuwG1CUVCGqcF0x51XKYa C/NiX6KP6OMu2bXzNUe+4U/VhWbh5Vlg5EamO1erZZVKFRw3ZUOCFNUBscAhgxR9GRft Rvem+MQTCdiaVCn9Yc4BlnMNMd5RA0DNunOnNvZftTL2/K+sebudK5i/2WhnXJn7kCrf 8fEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyC7mhHgv5Cho4EDbXtye1iZ8F5gcBx6X75wnkUE9OHbr3QWRXP Osf3SWHfUv9drBzhCb8XnxY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5XxE7qkMmTY2Ehr4lBCAHIRMo7+Pum83kyN9HK6pUBwpPFdqnjef/S9r0pjX2Zm5CLJgxu1g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e948:0:b0:306:2aac:4b84 with SMTP id m8-20020adfe948000000b003062aac4b84mr27823524wrn.30.1684228682000; Tue, 16 May 2023 02:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q12-20020adfea0c000000b003078354f774sm1901829wrm.36.2023.05.16.02.18.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 May 2023 02:18:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 10:17:59 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/239] 6.1.29-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230515161721.545370111@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230515161721.545370111@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 06:24:23PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.29 release. > There are 239 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20230511): mips: 52 configs -> no failure arm: 100 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3535 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3536 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip