Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pktcdvd: Use clamp_val() instead of min()+max()

['Andy Shevchenko' <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 01:35:11PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: 'Andy Shevchenko'
> > Sent: 20 June 2023 14:25
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:06:49PM +0000, David Laight wrote:

...

> > > > +		*hi = clamp_val(*hi, 500, 1000000);
> > >
> > > (standard rant about minmax.h)
> > >
> > > clamp_val() is pretty much broken by design.
> > > It MIGHT be ok here but it casts both limits to the
> > > type of the value being compared.
> > > In general that is just plain wrong.
> > >
> > > Like min_t() it is generally ok because the kernel only uses
> > > unsigned values between 0 and MAXINT.
> > >
> > > If min/max were ok, then using clamp() should also be ok.
> > 
> > Submit a patch to fix it, if you think you can make it better.
> > Obviously your comment can be addressed separately if we even
> > need that.
> 
> Did you try using clamp() ?
> 
> To see why clamp_val() is broken consider?
> 	unsigned char val = 200;
> 	...
> 	xxx = clamp_val(val, 10, 300);
>  
> This sets xxx to 44 - not exactly expected.

Right, clamp_val() has to be improved.
However this is not the case in this driver.

I have just sent a v2 with clamp().

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko